"If someone is speaking more about 'violent encampments' than they are about violent genocide of the Palestinians, they have a problem reflective of deep and dangerous biases," said one supporter.
I’d say BLM was near 0% violence but you’re say it was 100%.
Again, how do “I’m say” that BLM was near 100% violence? Most BLM protests were completely peaceful, meaning BLM was near 0% violent. Why do you lie and say I’m saying the opposite?
I’m coming at you for acting like you’re making a valid point, and lying when people confront you about it. Now, could you please explain?
What am I lying about?
You said:
Again, how do “I’m say” that BLM was near 100% violence? Most BLM protests were completely peaceful, meaning BLM was near 0% violent. Why do you lie and say I’m saying the opposite?
Unless you’re saying there was no violence at BLM then you’re saying it was 100% violent.
I’m saying it was near 0%.
Is that clear enough for you or do you need me to clarify something?
Multiple Palestine protests
Multiple BLM protests
One Jan 6 protest
Think that was the confusion here^
Are you positive it wasn’t 10,000 protests of 10 people happening at the same time and place?
lol
One protest of all the violent people and thousands of separate protests of nonviolent individuals
This statistically, overwhelmingly lawful and good
Exactly!
Finally someone gets it.
Pretty sure this guy is some kind of troll, especially because of the weird grammar. Reporting him and moving on.