• Leraje
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1652 years ago

    Elon: “100% free speech, always!”

    MediaMatters: “Here’s evidence Musk is an antisemite.”

    Elon: “I’m suing you for speaking freely!”

    • KptnAutismus
      link
      fedilink
      352 years ago

      i think it’s pretty funny to see this guy destroy everything he comes into contact with. we already have agreed that this guy is an idiot, so we can just circlejerk until this all goes away.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    522 years ago

    Why do we keep giving this guy a platform? Do we really care that much about twitter and his stupid shenanigans

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      Well, he owns and operates his own platform, where he’s making it terribly easy for fascists to fasc. His space vehicles and communications satellites are being depended on by major world powers. He’s got the largest electric vehicle charging infrastructure in the western hemisphere, if not the world.

      Like it or not, his shenanigans affect us all.

    • Leraje
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Because as someone with an obscene amount of money, power and influence he needs to be scrutinised and his every word and action examined.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      We are forced to care because Twitter and the twit running it have political influence. I sure would like for that to cease to be the case, but until it is we don’t have the luxury of ignoring it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      282 years ago

      We as in Lemmy users probably don’t care about Twitter at all. But there are 100s of Millions of active Twitter users, so it’s no surprise this is in the news.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        I don’t know that many people say that because of the story though. It created many of the cinematography methods we still use today. Before it, movies were generally just recreating stage plays in front of a camera. Every scene a stationary shot framing the whole room. No real transitions. For Citizen Kane they tore apart the roof and floor to allow for a camera to get moving shots zooming into a scene and angles not often used before. It changed the way people thought of movies and what they could be. People do love watching the slow decline of the powerful, but that movie is considered one of the best movies for other reasons.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Citizen Kane is recognized for many different reasons, and that’s one. But, in essence, the story is the film. Wells masterpiece was the result of a feud he had with William Randolph Hearst, so he brought him down on film. Wells also had the strange habit of divorcing wives and killing them off in one of his movies.

  • originalucifer
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    682 years ago

    as he has clearly abandoned his handlers, his outward communication gets worse and worse. hes like a stroke victim that refuses assistance, and is declining.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    712 years ago

    Musk, the richest man in the world, said today that he will be ‘holding his breath until everyone is nice to him’. The statement came as advertisers grew concerned about being associated with blatant antisemitism. A statement released by Apple claims that Musk is ‘acting up for attention and needs a timeout and possibly a nap.’ Musk responded with a post to X, formerly a semi-legitimate social media platform, that 'Apple is a big meanie who is in bed with the Jews. ’

  • jimmydoreisalefty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    This is a win for the status quo bloods and crips.

    To me, there is a lot to bash Musk on, but the twitter files confirmed and should have enlightened many of the problems we currently have with politicians/media/corporations being in bed with each other.

    This seems similar to the Russiagate stories pushed by legacy media.

    Smearing opposition of the status quo, then once the population believes the lies, the truth starts to comes out years later by MSM journalists.

    I make mistakes and I am willing to learn, so please if anyone can articulate and explain in detail?

    Why all the baseless hate against Musk, while we already know enough about how he treats his workers to be against him. No need to be hostile or to lie when talking about him.

    • Unaware7013
      link
      fedilink
      352 years ago

      but the twitter files confirmed

      Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

          • jimmydoreisalefty
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Twitter files shows a direct line of gov’t censorship on certain topics in social media.

            These also includes our alphabet agencies in this censorship.

            Many like to watch debates on such topics, I am one that does.

            I assume you don’t like such videos, so that is my bad.

              • jimmydoreisalefty
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Video is a debate, so it would require to make time for it or to treat as podcast and listen while on the move.

                I do not agree with Musk.

                Have a great day!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      Why all the baseless hate against Musk

      Well, you managed one of many reasons yourself…

      we already know enough about how he treats his workers to be against him.

      • jimmydoreisalefty
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Yes, but this article seems to be a smear of MSM.

        Due to not siding with Israel and instead talking of ceasefire or peace, same with Ukraine/Russia.

        Looking at the talk he had with Lex Fridman.

      • jimmydoreisalefty
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Did you not read all of my response.

        Consistency is required when looking at the problems we have.

        This is happenong to Musk, but the same happens to people on the left.

        Smears happen without proof, just for going against the status quo.

        This seems to be a smear for not siding with Israel, and calling for peace.

        Your response does not help make your point, it does the opposite.

        I am not sure what you are trying to get across.

        Reminds me of Trump derangement syndrome.

        Again, we have enough to bash Musk as is, no need to lie or make up things.

        • MxM111
          link
          fedilink
          132 years ago

          What do you mean without proof? Did you see the post the Musk said “is absolute truth”. Even Musk is not denying that that happened.

          • jimmydoreisalefty
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            It seems you pointed something out, but failed to explain your thought process.

            What did I miss?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              202 years ago

              That no one is making up a) his glowing endorsement of an antisemitic tweet and b) that advertisers have had their ads show up next to antisemitic (and otherwise racist) tweets, which is not a look many brands want to go with. We don’t have to make this shit up; it’s just what ol’ musky does. And if it walks like an antisemite, and it quacks like an antisemite…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          Trump derangement syndrome is where a person believes that Trump can do no wrong, is exceptionally strong and intelligent, and has been anointed by god to save the world from liberal vermin. It is rampant on twitter and among musk fanatics.

          • jimmydoreisalefty
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Yes, that may be so.

            That is why I commented, to educate myself on what I did not know, and what I thought it was about.

            People that know or are confident in opposing what I say will hopefully teach me a different point of view.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              152 years ago

              Yeah right, as if anybody parroting your trumptard garbage is looking to “learn the truth”

              Russian collusion with Trump is real, several of his employees went to prison over it. Then he pardoned them. Then he continued to publicly kiss Putin’s ass even while trashing the American military and intelligence agencies.

              Trump lost the 2020 election and failed to present any tangible evidence of widespread election fraud causing the vast majority of his legal cases to fail. He had his day in court about that and lost as hard as possible.

              Then he incited the 2021 insurrection purely out of his own hubris from being a sore loser, and now he’s on trial for that and will be going to prison.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1442 years ago

    Is it really thermonuclear if it can easily be dismissed with a couple of screenshots? And he is trying to allege fraud. This is the flimsiest crybaby tantrum he has had yet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      44
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Right? The media matters article screenshots clearly prove it’s allegations. Unless he tries the angle that they were photoshopped (and obviously he needs proof for it) this gets dismissed immediately.

      Hoping it doesn’t cost media matters anything or that they can recoup any fees they may incur from this. Nice to have real reporting with proof to back it up like they showed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        262 years ago

        Maybe he meant thermonuclear in the sense that it is mutually assured destruction because, as most trigger happy lawsuit threats tend to forget, a lawsuit means discovery. So a lot more dirt about Xitter and Musk would have to become public record.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    I really want to see him fall on his face suing people who choose to not do business at the nazi bar, then try to sue the ADL for pointing out he runs the nazi bar. Please, please, let him spend whatever he has left on this…

  • NutWrench
    link
    fedilink
    65
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    "Above everything, including profit, X works to protect the public’s right to free speech. But for speech to be truly free, we must also have the freedom to see or hear things that some people may consider objectionable,” he added.

    Good to know you believe in free speech. Elmo. So you won’t mind if companies exercise that right by choosing not to advertise on your racist, apartheid-loving network.

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Freedom of speech is connected to freedom of association, which also includes the freedom to not speak and to not associate (ie. halting advertising)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      But for speech to be truly free, we must also have the freedom to see or hear things that some people may consider objectionable,” he added._

      And the freedom to say “that’s objectionable” and choose not to be associated with it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Elon wants people to have the freedom to hear and see shit that makes them sick, but doesn’t want them to have the freedom to leave it’s presence.

        Elon’s a pretty twisted little shit, isn’t he?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        That’s not freedom of speech, that’s freedom of association. Different freedoms. Your point remakns though, I’m not arguing, just pointing that out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Also doesn’t freedom of speech not apply to companies

      Pretty sure it only applies to the government