Amazon faces potential break-up as FTC finalizes antitrust lawsuit | The FTC is getting ready for the big one::undefined

  • Lee Duna
    link
    fedilink
    English
    552 years ago

    We need to do the same with Microsoft and Google

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        Yes and no.

        The simple fact that you’re not using IE6 on MSN with Bing search to access a Windows server is more or less proof that the constraints placed on Microsoft at that time did actually have an impact (even if I felt robbed that the company wasn’t split up at the time).

        Today the one thing Microsoft is still dominante in is Office software (and even then Google docs is snapping at their heals).

        OS? Android is more popular than windows Server OS? Linux rules the roost Browser? Chrome

        The company that really needs scrutiny ATM is Google.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Uber has direct competition in Lyft, among other rideshares and entrenched taxi companies. Disney and Netflix are literal competitors. You’re on an alternative to Twitter right now, and Facebook is yet another. Apple has competitors in every industry. AirBnB has both tons of competition and 26% market share - below Booking.com

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          Oligopolies are still not competitive. We need research into finding out what market share starts distorting competition, and tying antitrust to that.

          A market with 2 competitors can still be broken down further.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Oligopoly has an actual meaning and that meaning isn’t “companies I have heard of”

            What’s funny is you hate Uber because you’ve heard of them but Yellow Cab had a literal monopolistic chokehold and you didn’t give a fuck at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        Eeeh. Apple’s App Store fees can be a bit much, but all told the company doesn’t have enough power on any market to warrant such a huge intervention I think. Just forcing them to make their ecosystem more open would be enough. Like how the EU wants to force them to allow 3rd party package managers on iOS.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          Luckily the EU wants much more, and already accepted regulation that will be implemented later this year to open all ecosystems up, completely. iMessage will have to provide an open API that provides the same service levels than the native client for example.

      • Corhen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I want to see the same happen to Apple, to many fingers in too many pies.

        Their app store, + cell phone, computer, publishing, music store, streaming service, ect ect.

        Want to see google, Microsoft, apple, and others all broken up.

    • elax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      The FTC is getting ready for the big one

      Sounds like it lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    Lol. What a crock of shit. If anyone thinks the oligarchs that run this country will allow this to happen you’re smoking rocks.

    This country leads the world in corruption & greed. Nothing will change that but this is great click bait.

    • Cranakis
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      You think the oligarchs make more or less money when Bezos has a monopoly?

      I think it may well happen because the oligarchs want Amazon broken up. Biden did appoint Lina Kahn as chair of the FTC. Kahn has long been vocal that Amazon needs to be broken up.

  • panCat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    Read similar news about meta , google and even microsoft ! Now it feels like a hogwash !

  • Buelldozer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    Great news! I hope it happens but I won’t be holding my breath. The US has gotten really bad about this kind of action over the past 20 years.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    652 years ago

    More than half of Amazon’s sales come from third-party merchants who this year started paying an average of over 50% commission on every sale, up from 35.2% in 2016, the result of it raising Fulfillment by Amazon fees every year and increasing storage fees.

    While paying for Amazon’s logistics and advertising services is optional, most merchants consider these, especially advertising, a necessary part of doing business. Moreover, the FTC has reportedly amassed evidence that Amazon disadvantages merchants who don’t use the services by giving them lower placements.

    Capitalism at its finest… I still remember when Amazon was just a humble online bookstore. How times have changed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I would be curious if all these influencers pushing FBA (Fulfilled by Amazon) where they got paid for the original thought because there is so much junk flowing into Amazon now especially people trying to use Amazon’s logistics.

      I can’t imagine there is great margin for a product listed on Amazon if half of every sale is given to Amazon for commission.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      No doubt this is slimy, but does it make Amazon a monopoly? It seems like a tough case for the FTC to win.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Not sure but giving your own products preferential placement on what you present to the public as an open marketplace is an anti-competitive behavior that they have been caught doing.

      • Muddybulldog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Took them ten years to split up AT&T and that was a literal monopoly. Near 100% market share.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Contrary to popular corporatist disinformation, anti-trust law isn’t just for literal control-100.000000%-of-the-market “monopolies.” Any company (or colluding group of companies) large enough to unduly influence the market can be subject to it.

        That’s why it’s called “anti-trust” law, not “anti-monopoly” law.

  • varoth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    If this does happen, I hope they find a way to do it that doesn’t make Bezos and the like richer, like what happened with Standard Oil years ago.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Would be great if the US started regulating big tech as harshly as the EU, let’s see how they like that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    The FTC hasn’t had a spine in decades, I doubt anything will come of this. It would be nice for once if the government actually gave a shit about monopoly busting, but they don’t care anymore. Not when corporations are legally allowed to bribe the ones making legislation, oh and also companies can be people now

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Does this need to happen? By God yes, a thousand times over. Will it actually happen with a positive effect? Big doubt.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    They will settle for increased regulation, knowing their army of lawyers will be able to manage it all while the little guy will get snowed under.

    So we’ll see even more small businesses fail while Amazon will continue to grow because the gov’t was lobbied into killing the competition.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      How exactly does helping small businesses access a worldwide market they otherwise would never get access to cause small businesses to “fail?”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        This wouldn’t be about small businesses accessing Amazon’s market - although the original point was that Amazon is becoming a monopoly and is taking advantage of that position with ridiculously high fees and commissions. This will be new regulations created and forced on every business (or ones that grow to a certain size).

        Amazon will say, “don’t break the company up, we welcome increased regulations to keep us honest” acting like that is a good compromise that solves the problem.

        The intent of the regs will be to stop Amazon from gaining an even bigger monopoly, but the affect will actually be smaller businesses will not be able to manage the increased red tape and change of laws (whereas Amazon has an army of lawyers to find loopholes, and waste time in the courts and not change a thing).

        This will stop small business growth and eliminate Amazon’s competition, further cementing the monopoly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Yeah I’m all about regs, but the idea Amazon somehow stifles small business is shaky at best

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Who in the fuck do they think they’re fooling? There hasn’t been any sort of large corporate antitrust breakup since Bell Systems in the early 80s. They expect us to believe that after 40 years of inaction, suddenly they’re going to do their jobs again? This is nothing but pandering to pad approval ratings. I would love to be wrong, but I’m not getting my hopes up.

      • DominusOfMegadeus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        I fully support the FTC burning it all down, but then I read this paragraph, and it did not give me confidence: “The FTC has had Amazon in its sights this year. The company recently agreed to a $5.8 million settlement with the Commission over Ring privacy violations that included employees spying on customers. And in June, the FTC sued Amazon over “deceptive” Prime subscription tactics.”

        5.8 million is probably Jeff Bezos’s weekly cheese budget. It’s loose change in his car seat.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 years ago

            If it’s about burning down the corporate regulatory capture and their stranglehold on markets that killed free market capitalism, then it’s not the quiet part. That’s the literal mission of the FTC that it hasn’t been fulfilling for half a century now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Great, instead of one overvalued company, Jeff Bezos will own majority stakes in multiple overvalued companies.