• edric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    Crap I just opened youtube today and it looks like I was chosen. The ads load like normal videos and it sucks. My brain actually glitched for a couple of seconds when I opened a video because I wasn’t used to seeing an ad. I dunno if there’s any chance uBO can even counter this.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      Try to watch the video embedded, simply edit it’s URL, using instead of

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxxxxxxx

      this URL

      https://www.youtube.com/embed/xxxxxxxx

      • edric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Welp, restarted my laptop and I’m off the testing list so can’t replicate (unless I turn off uBO of course). But thanks, this will be handy if it happens again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’ll make youtube disappear for me.

    Over the years I watched less and less. I only seldomly have to look into youtube for things that are easier in video than in text.

    Teens and many people don’t know that there is a world without ads. They have to be educated that there are alternatives - not watching youtube is a real option. You do not depend on it.

    I’s a horrible world many people live in. Recently I saw someone browsing on instagram, each third post is an ad and oftentimes there are ads after ads. And people follow other people and watch their ads. Incredible!

    Recently, I was browsing linkedin and there were 12 ads instead of real jobs in a row. in a row. Unrelated to my profession.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      But the point is there’s always been a way to avoid ads, even while browsing sites with ads and browsing YT. Personally, if that ability entirely disappears, i hate ads, ad-voice, and the concept of advertising so much that I will stop and close a whole tab if an ad plays. I’m in the minority though. Because, I think you’re right, a lot of people just don’t even think about it and mindlessly consume. I can’t. When Reddit fucked us and showed us our opinions and feelings didn’t matter, I left. I will do the same to YT.

      • Jeena
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I think I hate ads just as much. But I might cave in and start subscribing to premium again. I just stopped because they don’t allow a family plan here in Korea.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I will just start downloading videos and watching them at my leisure. Anything to not give this corp my money. Funny thing is I use to have no problem watching ads on youtube until they increased the amount and started spamming ads for gambling. There is an option to select on your google account that limits the amount of gambling ads you see. I had that enabled and it felt like it increased the amount of gambling ads it was serving me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      I think many people see it as normal/expected.

      A coworker showed me a video yesterday on their phone, I said ‘holy hell what is this shit? This is what it looks like for you?’ And opened it in Tubular. They had no idea such a thing existed.

      I rarely watch videos because I prefer to read. The people I work with spend a vast amount of their free time watching YouTube and TikTok. They just seem to zone out, or be really interested when an ad comes on.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        I think many people see it as normal/expected.

        Yes, that’s it. People born in the early part of last century (my grandparent’s era) only knew over-the-air TV which in the US included commercials. It was just part of reality, like billboards by the highway.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      For a lot of things I already had changed to alternative sites, the best alternative to YT IMHO is Odysee, music of all kind you can listen here 24/7, or in Bandcamp, for movies there is PlutoTV and the pages of the local public TV for free, news are in the homepage of the prefered newspaper, etc…

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Certainly there are also neonazis, like in all other streaming platforms too, including YT, where I already blocked some channels because of this. Worst is removedute respect nazies.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Idk, Maybe instead of avoiding nazi spaces, people should take a page from their book and just invade them and overwhelm them. Idk about you, I have to put up with hearing and seeing bullshit daily, so my tolerance is high. A lot of these fascist can’t even handle a picture of a catboy lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Inserting ad clips between DASH HLS packets seems to have done the trick for YouTube. RIP ad blocking on YouTube. Have fun I guess… :/

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      We’ll see.At the moment I see any ads, nor nags in YT, using userscripts instead of extensions, but anyway I’m going to keep an eye on what’s happening in Greasyfork and OpenuserJS regarding YT in the future, this in any case offers many more options than the castrated extensions that will be in the stores to be able to stay there.

      • WorseDoughnut 🍩
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Don’t be too optimistic, you probably haven’t seen it because it’s not being rolled out universally just yet; they like to A/B test their massive feature changes.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          We’ll see, it’s sad but anyway I can live without YT, I’v other sites in my bookmarks to watch and listen what I want, I can only recommend trying to find the alternatives that work for each person and send YT to hell.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I am pessimistic about scripts being able to handle this, since it is a server side manipulation of streaming packets. It might be interesting if instead of seeing ads, a workaround is invented where the ad is not shown to user and video remains black and silent for that duration, and Google gets to hear such a thing has happened. If they get angry about it, it might reveal more about what they desire with forcing watching ads for people.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I’m not so pessimistic, as the proverb says, where there is a law, there is also a way around it. There are many very capable devs who are screwed by YT and Google as well like us and in the script repositories they have a free hand, which as devs for extensions they do not have. YT is the only problem for adblockers, even the inbuild blocker in Vivaldi works flawles, even cutting off cookie advices and some paywalls, only in YT it fails. But the userscript I use instead in YT work there even better than uBO, at least until now. Extensions are all limited by the imposed norms in the stores, more in the near future, it’s this because I trust more in scripts, at least for certain tasks… As said, we’ll see.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    That move would finally rid me of my addiction to YouTube. So much time, so many possibilities…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    381 year ago

    I know this is an unpopular opinion but I love YouTube and it really bums me out to have to drop it. My home account has been heavily curated over the past two decades and it’s pretty rare to see a video on my homepage from the shitty part of YouTube…now I’m getting ads and just closing the tab. I have a separate account just for listening to music on my work laptop and I’ve found a ton of new artists through it, too…not sure what I’m gonna do once it starts getting ads, too.

    I have a Nebula subscription but only like 1/3 of the channels I watch are on there. And obviously none of the music

    • Jeena
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Why don’t you drop the nebula subscription and pay for YouTube premium then? You get rid of the ads and get some extra features and can keep your curated account.

      This isn’t a solution for everyone, but those who can afford it could help making YouTube make money and keep it around.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Because Nebula pays more to the creators. The people who make the videos I watch didn’t make shit on YouTube

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I feel the same way. Or felt. It is a wonderful platform that will let anyone upload and share videos at absolutely no cost. Video hosting isn’t as expensive as we are often lead to believe, but it isn’t cheap. Especially if you want to provide a great experience like different resolutions and qualities.

      I used to subscribe to YouTube Premium and was quite happy about it. However they slowly made the platform worse and worse. At some point it hurt to give them money, even if the subscription was “worth it”. I just didn’t like giving money to people destroying a great platform.

      Luckily YouTube still supports RSS. This means that I can easily mix in other video platforms with no bother. I now subscribe to Nebula and have 35 subscriptions there. I also have a handful of PeerTube, video podcasts and other self-hosted creators. It isn’t the “majority” of my subscriptions (Apparently I have ~200 YouTube channels that I subscribe to, but a huge number of them are dead, second channels or incredibly infrequent.) but it doesn’t matter. All of my subscriptions come to the same “inbox” and it doesn’t really matter what platform they are on.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Video hosting isn’t as expensive as we are often lead to believe,

        Then do it yourself. Video hosting is the most expensive form of hosting you can do on internet, and no other form of media even comes in the ballpark (games, photos, audio, text, databases). YouTube is running on CIA money. None of us can pull off what they do, because the fucking US government is running YouTube in an indirect way. Wanna know who owns Utah data centers? That’s right, US government agencies and its little puppet corpos.

        Tiktok, as colossal as it is, does not even compare because it hosts merely 30-60 second video clips. YouTube hosts an average of 10 minute videos and countless hour long documentaries and video essays. Even the likes of MindGeek owned porn sites are tiny compared to what YouTube hosts. Vimeo, Dailymotion, Facebook, VKontakte, Bilibili, none of those ever became as big for video hosting.

        The reality is we have lived as freeloaders since the 90s, and many of these Big Tech services should not have been free in the first place. Now we are used to the convenience of these digital drugs. I forgot who talked about this once in a blog, but I will echo that message, and am unapologetic for this blackpill.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    It depends on what the publishers publish for. If it’s money then Peertube is probably not attractive.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Not with the crrent ones, it’s easier to difference ads by code than by content in most Vids, eg, divulgations, news, influencers, etc. YT, to not destroy the own business modell, also avoiding that there later also 5 years old vids with outdated ads, must use some kind of dynamic insertion, that means, it can be discovered and skipped by some userscripts, for sure not in the extension stores, but in Greasyfork or OpenuserJS, which are independent from Google influence.

  • Turd Ferg
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    Thats fine. This just fuels developers to make more efficient ad blockers. Youtube wont win the long game and the more they try stuff like this, the more people find out about ublock and other adblockers.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      uBO and other traditional adblockers can do nothing against embedded ads in YT vids, at least not those in the extension stores. YT won’t permit extensions in the official stores to make useless it’s new policy. The solution can only be in independent sources, that is the problem. In the stores you’ll find only descaffeinated adblockers which blocks only traditional ads on websites. Install, Greasymonkey or Violentmonkey, maybe Tampermonkey and keep an eye on the script repositories.

    • jlow (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      321 year ago

      Yeah, that’ll be hard. I’m trying to use Peertube but network effect is big on YT (not sure if that’s the right expression here, noone is using Peertube, everyone is on YT).

      • Marud
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        I’m sending my videos on my Peertube and Youtube. I send the link for Peertube a few days before Youtube, so people following me would have more interest on looking at it on PT earlier but the numbers can’t be beaten : between 5 and 20 views on PT against 1K / 2K on Youtube.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          161 year ago

          I like Odysee, but there’s a lot of right-wing bullshit on there that give me a major case of cringe.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            So don’t watch it? I would rather the platform all all legal content then trying to be the morality police.

            I would also prefer to use third party recommendation engines (like people posting on Lemmy) then one run by any particular platform.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              81 year ago

              Sure, but it’s literally every other thumbnail and it pisses me off as I do not tolerate intolerance.

          • Onihikage
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Odysee takes a lot of curation to even be usable. You can block whole channels easily and they won’t show up for you anywhere, but once you’ve blocked all the RWB you’re left with mostly tech, gaming, and reactions. And this is despite Odysee/LBRY having been around for years.

          • Bilb!
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            That’s not unlike youtube really

      • lemmyreader
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Yeah, that’ll be hard. I’m trying to use Peertube but network effect is big on YT (not sure if that’s the right expression here, noone is using Peertube, everyone is on YT).

        There was a time “noone” was on YouTube.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        241 year ago

        We don’t need a new platform. We need 20 new platforms, and authors can post on whichever ones are best for them. Have real competition and real incentive to be better.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Been using Nebula for a while now. Going to miss some YouTube creators, but I’ll expect to get over it.

  • Zeke
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    Honestly, I just pull videos from Youtube to watch later. I don’t actually watch anything on Youtube. I do wonder if there’s an upcoming replacement for Youtube like there was for Twitter.

  • Track_Shovel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    What are the YT alternatives? I use it by default and I’m to exhausted to look for another landing place

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    21
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    YT has 2 posibilities

    • Hosting all videos doble, one with ads and the same vids without for premium user
    • Insert also markers which at the end also are exploited by adblockers and userscripts

    I think they’ll hit their teeth against a rock with this.

    Meanwhile a lot of content creators a changing to Odysee

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      301 year ago

      That’s not true. The way their streaming works is basically a Playlist of shorter fragments. They can easily insert their own fragments without obvious visual tells if they don’t alter other elements of the page to indicate that an ad is playing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        But they will have to alter othet elements on the page. For example, scrubbing. It will either have to be paused at one specific timestamp while the ad is playing or the ad would have to be incorporated into the length of the video.

        In either case, it is detectable.

        The video chunks hash can be calculated and then blocked, in a crowdsourced way like with sponsorblock (but way more effective, because it will cover all videos)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The obvious solution to me is sponsorblock switching to sampling pixels out of each frame, like that project that encoded data into video streams (yet resilient to compression), there are algorithms that could fingerprint any ad with an extremely high degree of accuracy. It’d be more complex than the current implementation, but it’d also be more resilient. I’d settle for it hiding the video and suppressing the audio for the ads duration, possibly displaying a countdown timer, vs actually watching the ad. Then Youtube would get paid, but have no way of knowing you haven’t seen the ad, and the metrics around their ad effectiveness would ultimately suffer, so users still win.

          You could even go so far as to have the client cache the video, several minutes in advance, dropping all the ad frames, so it’s a seamless experience for the user. I got money, but will spend 10x as much ensuring Google gets less from me. It ain’t about money. It’s about sending a message!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      one with ads and the same vids without for premium user

      If it worked that way, which others have already explained it doesn’t, that would break their business model of showing each person individually targeted ads.

    • Jessica
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I think they’ll hit their teeth against a rock with this.

      Press X to doubt

      Most people do not have an adblocker. Most people watch YouTube to varying degrees of frequency and duration. Most people will continue to watch the ads. I’d be surprised if YT noticed any amount of users leaving the site because of this. The privacy minded folk are few and far between.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Better than any other- Well, there are some selfhosted video sites like PeerTube and others, but respect content are not a real alternative, nor other proprietary streaming sites, like removedute, Vimeo, Dailymotion, etc. Front-ends or desktop clients (FreeTube) with the new YT policy will die. What other alternatives then?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago
      • Hosting all videos doble, one with ads and the same vids without for premium user

      Not quite sure why, they simply could in the fly stitch those files together.

      Twitch is doing that for a while now i think.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Exactly this. It isn’t even really “stitching” as YouTube videos are served as a series of short chunks anyways. So you simply tell the player that there are a few extra chunks which happen to be ads. There is no video processing required it is basically free to do it this way on the sever side.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          That is true. But then you could probably use the chunk length to determine where the ads starts and ends since there is with a very high probability an unusually long chunk at those times.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I don’t know about YouTube but the chunks are often a fixed length. For example 1 or 2 seconds. So as long as the ad itself is an even number of seconds (which YouTube can require, or just pad the add to the nearest second) so there is no concrete difference between the 1s “content” chunks vs the 1s “ad” chunks.

            If you are trying to predict the ad chunks you are probably better off doing things like detecting sudden loudness changes, different colour tones or similar. But this will always be imperfect as these could just be scene changes that happened to be chunk aligned in the content.