It’s essentially an open source fork of maps.me by the original creators.

I’ve been using OSMAnd for years, but it always felt laggy and not that reliable. Searching was slow and so on. Many street or things it didn’t instantly find.

In the Graphene App Store I jnust discovered Accrescent (another app store thing but only with like 10 apps - they’re all gold though, god damn)

An in there I found organic maps. And this shit is google maps level responsive. If you’re on the lookout for a google maps replacement - consider trying this.

Byeeee

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    I always felt drawn back to G-Maps until a few months ago when a friend recommended this app. Organic Maps is gorgeous!

  • Kokesh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    It is great. But too bad for me - I live 40km away from the nearest town, in the forest of northern Sweden. So the coverage here is quite not so good. Practically all I see is the main road.

    • da_cow (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      You can actually contribute to it. There areso.me great mobile apps for this. I recommend Vespucci for in detail changes(creating new structures or editing their properties) and Street Complete for filling missing information.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      It’s open street map data. If there isn’t mapping info for your area, you can fix that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Organic Maps is my goto solution for car navigation because it is very quick, responsive and does not require an high end phone. It just works. However for anything more advanced than that (e.g. live location sharing or recording, planning a hiking trip, navigating mountain bike trails, contributing to OpenStreemMap), OSMAnd is still without contender.

    • SeekPie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      For me, it’s even better than GMaps, because it lets me navigate on bike paths, which GMaps couldn’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Here a a few things that I miss from OsmAnd:

        • adding more than a handful of routing points is tedious
        • you cannot plan partially or fully independent from existing roads
        • no way to save and restore a planned trip
        • no overlays for hill shading or incline visualization. Very useful for assessing the effort of a route.
        • no public transport support. Very useful for planning a trip with transitions.
        • no rain radar
        • satellite view
  • BlossomingAsp [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    I just started using it, and I would say it’s even snappier then G Maps. I was pretty skeptical at first, and it does have a few things I miss, like public transport live updates, but I can use the app of the local provider for that and in my experience G Maps can be quute inaccurate anyway. No way I’m going back now. You need some space to preload the maps though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    100% agree with this post. Mostly using google maps now for car route planning (still unbeatable in rerouting in case of car accidents etc. afaik).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Does it do navigation with routes based on current traffic conditions? Because that’s table stakes to me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’ll at least give you good directions, car/bicycle/walking-optimized based on what you select.

          It’ll get there, just needs time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I mean great if it gets there but in the meantime I’m not going to recommend it to anyone as a google maps replacement. It does look like a good maps.me replacement for hiking though!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I wouldn’t have said it was a replacement just yet to non -open source centric folks, personally.

              More attention isn’t a bad thing though, sometimes devs need more input to decide what to focus on next.

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    It is pretty solid. It lacks some advanced features such as routing around preset areas but that’s a minor complaint.

    Aldo it is only as good as OSM. Get to work on the map.

    • JustEnoughDucks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Also the search doesn’t work, so there is that…

      Also using it in android auto is a pain and every action takes between 10x and 100x longer than on the phone.

      But yeah it is pretty good and I try to contribute to it when I can. I don’t know how to contribute to bad instruction translations though. It just says “verlaat” on an exit in dutch which grammatically makes no sense.

      • Fugtig Fisk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I noticed that it only downloads local maps initially. You can download more maps and expand the area that it searches in. Maybe this is why you are having issues with searches? I assume that if you search for a place in a map that it hasn’t downloaded it may have trouble finding it.

        • JustEnoughDucks
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Nope. I type in SPAR and it gives me a bunch of random results 150km away.

          I type in Grocery and it gives me SPAR 1.5km away.

          I need to type in the exact address for it to find a place, with no errors. Otherwise I can type a category name and hope that it finds it and that I guessed right, that also works.

          If you type in a partial name (I.e. not the full legal name including company abbreviations) of a store it will break itself and show you completely random unrelated results from a random place in the country.

          I took a bunch of screenshots a while back as proof.

          It is fundamentally broken, and it is widely reported IIRC, but I don’t know if there are any issues open about it.

  • a new sad me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Specifically for Prague (ha! I’m here now) mapy is insanely good

  • suoko
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    In Berlin it was missing some public transportations like tram

  • fraksken
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Idk … In their description on f-droid they crossed out “no pesticides” and wrote “purely organic” … It implies they are using organic pesticides. Not sure if that’s something for me tbh.

    Edit: screenshot added

  • cheers_queers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    so i opened this app for the first time just now and entered my address, but it only went to my street. when i tap my house, it just says “building”… is there no residential support?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Depends in where you live. For instance in Germany house numbers are associated with the building but in France house numbers are their own object. The Idea there being that one should map the location where the plate with the houseumber is, and not the building(s) its associated with. If you dig throug osm map forums or issue trackers you’ll find the dispute resurfacing every now and then.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    After a few days of use - as a cyclist - I only have one note. I’m missing the cycling style option from OSM. That’s a real game changer right there.