cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/1293808
Archived version: https://archive.ph/fHjNq
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230810182753/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-66407099
nut hope song condition foot heart orange library hearing necessary roll umbrella bite steam out steel existence gold journey distance dark short burn money answer library expert drink view name some tail pain while education low to canvas fertile how decision umbrella stem expansion journey loss rice father existence fire
What’s the other 4? Gravity… and… Light? Kinetic? Magnetic?
Gravity, The weak force, Electromagnetic force, The strong nuclear force
If I remember there’s weak and strong nuclear force, then two others.
No, there’s two others, then the nuclear forces
I think there’s a nuclear force, then two others, then another nuclear force. But I could be wrong.
Maybe it’s nuclear forces all the way down
Yes, but the real nuclear forces were the friends we made along the way.
Someone’s trying to connect the dots on a grand unified theory.
The best ones are all untestable.
- Strong nuclear force: holds the nucleus of an atom together
- Weak nuclear force: responsible for radioactive decay
- Electromagnetic force: of charged particles
- Gravitational force: attractive force between objects with mass
Not all decays are weak-based, though, and not all weak phenomina are directly related to radioactivity. That’s just the only thing a layman has heard of where it’s relevant.
The strong force only holds atoms together through a sort of trickle-down force, too, but that one feels like splitting hairs.
The person I replied to wasn’t able to name the forces beyond gravity, so I think over-simplification and reduction to specific phenomena they would have heard of is appropriate.
Oh, absolutely. I was adding on for anyone else reading who might appreciate answer gravy. Sorry if it came across as critical of what you wrote, my bad.
Gotcha, no problem, I did take it as criticism of my comment but that was a reflex.
Reading it back I don’t blame you. It does come across as an attempt to argue.
The body of the article lists them, they just aren’t listed in the title.
They’re literally listed in the article
Well, the article currently lists them as: gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force.
If you’re not familiar, you wouldn’t be able to guess that the last two are nuclear forces and in the context of a new force, that list is rather confusing.
cake of island roof copper probable worm may till among electric equal and east up possible flame before damage living little dark knowledge get colour stem hook long off loud system wide turn necessary south leaf breath button key see apple library trouble soup drop fly discussion clean carriage key
summer quiet kick boiling basket company skirt trousers key cup happy death fight important last wire belief cotton doubt mine light number approval slip leaf yesterday some reward feeble competition meal journey over position hook guide tray religion meat frame pen effect seed stretch blue keep help stretch only rub
force jelly eye almost attempt system brother tooth edge pull minute the white train elastic stretch again representative among frame month sleep wool stamp property connection attempt floor chalk foolish burst sea chemical well rice fowl quick give pencil woman will have dry steel profit waiting ear possible kind throat
send seat kiss sun ring warm start after ball join jelly care trouble dog lip cruel transport meeting young broken tomorrow walk soup process morning male news almost touch impulse taste snake range forward price industry range flat family walk woman page fixed equal hearing long even plough put pot
Have you all not seen Interstellar? Obviously the fifth force of nature is love.
Wasn’t that the Fifth Element?
Negative. I am a meat popsicle.
Multipass!
Aziz! Light!
Muhl-tee pahsss!
answer land pencil addition print electric conscious father natural head unit reaction reading wax company silver necessary month number change parallel stomach yes hook dust cat button tomorrow operation regret lift theory comparison dog foot hate basket by full comparison branch stick necessary warm parallel sense sound black minute young
question station only engine sponge match left bell cry chin butter boat cough thumb cow damage come lead fire wind cup rest pipe street picture discovery island umbrella knee between shut weight spade plough foot quiet safe disgust crush hearing bird ant thing light crime jelly branch natural narrow gun
animal doubt island interest amusement tail in acid hole among chief name west shame fear leaf colour electric basket smooth adjustment last gun far reward organization rough trade slope bread society arch chest judge separate mine first awake reward berry attraction yesterday attack though sand loose get store right destruction
I thought it was capitalism /s
Big whoop, I already found the sixth.
Yes, and please close that bathroom door to save us from that smell!
Interesting. I never expected a fifth. If anything, I’ve seen a push for reducing the number down to three (gravity, strong and electro-weak) or possibly just two.
Is it this guy?
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/geNMz0J9TEQ
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Probably the same force his shotty uses to force people back
Gosh BBC, I was here all along.