• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Why would you be homeless when you could just perform slave labor grow organic lettuce on a isolated off-the-grid tech-free camp farm in Kansas?

      That’s the plan for people “addicted” to (prescribed) amphetamines and ssri’s, right? What is that, like, 1 in 3 millennials? (no shade I’m in that group)

      Why not send offer the homeless to go there too, if it’s so great?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1496 months ago

    Don’t forget the new tax plan also includes tax increases for us plebs too!

    Cut benefits, increase payments! Good job Magoos!

  • nifty
    link
    fedilink
    96 months ago

    This is dumb, you can do America First policies and have FDR-type socialism, or Nordic model policies, together. American permanent residents and citizens should get benefits they pay for via their taxes. Simple.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      America is the land of wealth not well-being. Would you want to live out your retirement in America or Denmark?

    • Omega
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      It is dumb, as long as your goal is to be as rich as possible and not be as powerful as possible

      You will generate better profit from a rich population; they’ll also advocate for your business if you openly support their ascension, and you’d lose nothing in profits by doing so

      But you do lose power. Power over people, and the benefit of doubt that the government won’t strike down on you if you appease, and the people will have more important shit to focus on now that their benefits are gone

      Both parties did this, republicans can do it more outwardly without causing a split in parties

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        286 months ago

        I don’t understand why do people upvote this.

        Fuck so-called socialism, anarchism, communism and other far-left or extreme ideologies, and collectivism too (where everyone is poor).

        Individualism made living for the people better. Democracies were based on individualism (and liberalism), where they care about every person.

        What do you need is to not to build another system, but to make rule of law and regulations strong. In the EU, for example, and around the world, there is problem not in social democracy/liberal democracy, but with economic inequality.

        But you’re just want to trick Americans to another utopia, fairytales like “capitalism = evil”. It will eventually turn into chaos, tyranny, and then there will dictator after dictator. Again, there will be small group of rich people, who will be oppress everyone, deprive food from them, don’t care about basic needs of population. They will steal resources from the country, but regular people in the country will be poor.

        Look at Russia or China, where they also thought that all problems with

        If individualism is so great and socialism so horrible why do the rich get constant support from the government? Shouldn’t they be the best at being individuals? Why is it the poor are expected to make do with little to no help? But the rich walk into the upper reaches of government for simply graduating high school?

        You say if we get rid of our economic system it will cause a resurgence of a small ruling elite who will oppress everyone, deprive them of food. And they won’t care about the basic needs of the population. Did you not see Trump turn off Medicaid? Have you not checked the grocery prices lately?

        You also make the mistake of an either/or fallacy. It’s either unregulated capitalism, or centrally planned communism. But that’s just not how the world works. For example we can have a market economy with government administered health, education, telecoms, and mass transit. A guaranteed job program is not incompatible with private industry.

        Finally, you responded to a sarcastic remark about how our country treats the different classes with this utterly crap take that ironically demonstrates the exact problem. The second someone mentions the dreaded S word the woodworks bleed people running to shout about Totalitarian rule like we would be forced to give up Democracy. All to defend the system that supports people who were born with a silver spoon and oppresses those born into a family of debt.

        As a note - Something to think about, the Annual US GDP is 27 Trillion dollars. Evenly split among all adults that’s over 100,000 dollars. Hardly poverty…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      While I agree the US does a fraction of what they could: Social Security

      Medicare

      Medicaid

      WIC

      HUD

      ESG

      COC

      Department of Education

      The list goes on and on. If you think there aren’t a LOT of social programs that they can cut, you are in for a very, very rough time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        I sympathize with the commentor who you are responding to although I know my present crap life could always get worse and probably will. Just doesn’t feel like much to lose

      • Dogiedog64
        link
        fedilink
        116 months ago

        Buddy, I’m being sarcastic here. I KNOW they’re gonna destroy tons of public services like that. The cruelty is the point.

  • HotsauceHurricane
    link
    fedilink
    English
    206 months ago

    almost as if it were billionaires working for the benefit of other billionaires…

    • Lemminary
      link
      fedilink
      126 months ago

      Idk how it hasn’t occurred to these billionaires yet that some of those few benefits are what keeping people from going full Luigi. They keep fucking around.

  • AItoothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    426 months ago

    Hmm interesting how all the efficiency that they are introducing requires cutting benefits. Almost as if they were pleasing the 1% or something.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    156 months ago

    See, this right here is the MAIN AGENDA of the qon elitists.

    All the other identity politics bullshit is largely red meat for his dipshit base. Sure, there are true believers like Bannon and Miller that are for that, but this is the MAIN thing: sending more money to the already extremely and obscenely affluent, and fucking the 99%.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      56 months ago

      Well, that and crashing the economy to steal everything they don’t already own for a pittance.

  • FundMECFSOP
    link
    fedilink
    1526 months ago

    I knew this would happen and loads of people on lemmy accused me of “fearmongering” or “only caring about myself” when I said I’d vote Harris

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      376 months ago

      That’s nuts. “Only voting for yourself” is usually a trump vote. Generally, a Left-wing voter asks “What’s best for everyone?” and a Right-wing voter asks “What’s best for me?”

      Of course, the Democrat party isn’t left-wing (more like middle-right) but still, it’s a far less selfish vote than trump.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        196 months ago

        I don’t know about your life, but my life is made better by the acceptance and participation of all sorts of people. I’m selfishly voting for Democrats because I have 4 daughter and a gay son.

        My wife and I make enough money and I could be happy on less if it improved the environment around me by improving the lives of the people I share the world with. Those brown people would be a hell of a lot less scary to us white people if so many of them weren’t in desperate financial straits, and if we didn’t teach them to expect hatred and cruelty from us.

        I’m a selfish-as-fuck-left-wing-voter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1136 months ago

      “Kamala Harris is not the perfect progressive candidate in every way. How can I possibly vote for her? I’ll sit this one out. That’ll show 'em!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I voted for her because she was the lesser evil, but describing her as just “not the perfect progressive candidate in every way” is a gross misrepresentation. She was probably the most right leaning Democratic candidate to run in a general election and was openly adopting many of the Republican stances. There were basically two Republicans running.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        116 months ago

        Trump won because the people that voted for him actually like him, they aren’t choosing the lesser of two evils or whatever nonsense. The democrats message of “at least we aren’t as bad” was awfully inspiring.

        Hey democrats, if you win what will you do with that power? Change nothing? Cool!

        Blame the democrats for getting tight lipped about literally anything anyone cared about.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          56 months ago

          You didn’t listen - they talked about corporations buying houses, the middle class disappearing, being unable to live on minimum wage, expanding medical for people that need it.

          The idea that a political party will change just because they lost because they weren’t exactly where you wanted is also ignorant. That’s never a guarantee. Otherwise we would currently be living in utopia. Maybe it will cycle back, by the time we’re all dead

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            They honestly spent too much time talking about tax credits to start a business. Starting a business? Lady, I’m starting to look seriously at fleeing the country in hopes of finding one that hasn’t lost its collective mind.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        746 months ago

        People need to accept that the electoral system in the US is just a trolley problem at the end of the day unfortunately.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          Not quite.

          For starters it didn’t use to be a choice of “who would you rather see killed” - or in other words, nothing was forever lost if one side won instead of the other - and beyond that it has always been a cyclical choice, so it made sense for voters who felt insufficiently catered to, to punish a side on one cycle to try and get it to offer a better deal on the next cycle.

          Whether that remains the case - i.e. will Trump make himself dictator for life - is the big question.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            That’s true but I didn’t mean it as a choice of who you’d rather see killed, just that the system is set up in such a way that as a rational voter you are forced into a situation where you must act to prevent the worst outcome rather than voting for your interests and what you believe in.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          396 months ago

          Basically, and people let ‘the enemy of perfect get in the way of good enough’. Progress is incremental unfortunately. That’s just how it is. We can accept that, or we get this crap.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              216 months ago

              This is exactly the fucking problem, if it’s not perfect enough then people allow it to get worse instead.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                8
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                The only way a political party changes is when they stop winning.

                If Democrats think they will win by being Republicans who hate the gays a little bit less, then that is what they’ll do. They were just shown that that isn’t a winning strategy, so we’ll see if the party changes tack or doubles down.

                “You monster, it is your fault you gave us Trump”

                I make my voting preferences known in every primary, state, and federal election. I actively volunteer for candidates I like. The party knows what will earn my vote, if they wanted it. If they make the strategic bet that getting my vote will cost them more from somewhere else, then that is on them.

                “That is so entitled, how could you”

                Have you ever considered that the reason both parties seem so out of touch with mainstream thought is because they have 10s of millions of people who will vote regardless of policy, thereby preventing the parties from understanding what is actually effective in getting them votes?

                Elections are an information gathering mechanism.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  96 months ago

                  You seem to think there will be real elections again rather than the type they have in Russia now that Republicans control all three branches of government.

                  I’m not sure why. Do you think they will ever willingly give up power?

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  66 months ago

                  Your vote was meaningless? Even in local elections? You sat out the whole thing because of the top of the ticket?

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      396 months ago

      With me, at least, they have moved on to, “you care more about your gay daughter than Palestinians!” Which… yeah. That’s called parenting. Along with, “why are you worried about a queer genocide that hasn’t happened yet?!” Because I don’t want to chance it? People can be such assholes.

      • FundMECFSOP
        link
        fedilink
        32
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s like yeah.

        If both candidates mean gaza is fucked, but one of them means hundreds of thousands of extra unnecessary deaths to disabled people, homeless people, migrants, poor people, queer and trans people etc.

        Of fucking course I’ll pick the least bad option instead of being apathetic about it. Especially since I’m a disabled poor person who has had bouts of homelessness.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          186 months ago

          These same people do not seem to understand that “least bad option” does not mean “good option.” Some of them are now justifying it by saying Harris supports genocide but all Trump supports is ethnic cleansing. Seriously.

          I have always taken the advice of W.C. Fields: “I never vote for, only against.” Because there has never been a politician in my adult life that I would have voted for in a general presidential election. Or even a senatorial election,

          • FundMECFSOP
            link
            fedilink
            146 months ago

            Same. I’m an anarchist. I don’t believe in this distorted liberal democratic system that seems to benefit the elite no matter the outcome.

            But I sure as hell am going to exercise my right to vote. It being a shitty system where I have little power doesn’t mean I should throw away the power I do have!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1296 months ago

    cutting taxes for the wealthy could risk damaging the populist image that Trump has cultivated.

    It’s never seemed to damage his image with his supporters before. He could hold them down and shit into their mouths and they’d find a reason to think it was an ok thing to do

  • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed
    link
    fedilink
    47
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I dont think these people realize how close they are to being ripped apart in the street by an angry mob…and I kind of hope they don’t realize it until its too late.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      266 months ago

      Really? The people affected by this wanted this turd in the office or at least didn’t have a problem enough with him to go vote for someone else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Because the people who need this money are leading rough, rough lives already and often don’t have the time or energy to properly learn politics. They’re the kind of people who can’t afford to miss work or looking after their family to vote.

        They’re victims of their circumstances and now they’re going to suffer more for it. They’re not the enemies here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      Are they though? Are they? Or is everyone too focused on not upsetting the status quo to even throw a pebble in protest?

      • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        Give it a few months. Also it will be a situation of critical mass. Seemingly nothing until it hits the tipping point, then suddenly massive

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        186 months ago

        For real. I talk with my friends about the tipping point, and this unfortunately ain’t it by a mile. MAGAts don’t make up the entirety of R voters, but not one MAGAt would give a shit if D voters started getting rounded up. It’s been an incredibly thorough brainwashing effort by whoever spearheaded the effort. R used to mean small government, states rights! Now it means fuck Joe Biden, fuck your feelings, fuck work culture. And it all feels like it happened so fast. Say what you want about Bush, but the sentiment among those who voted for him wasn’t this open hostility that we have today.