It is not illegal for consumers to boycott companies. The Supreme Court in 1982 ruled the First Amendment protects Americans’ rights to protest private businesses.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      They usually suffocate on their pillows in the middle of the night. Really mysterious how that keeps happening.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    154 months ago

    Soooo … Trump thinks he can force people to buy Teslas? Just like Elon is trying (and failing) to sue companies for not advertising on Twitter.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    84 months ago

    I can’t even afford a used car from 2015. Even if i wanted a Tesla, which I don’t, I wouldn’t even be able to buy one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    554 months ago

    Trump said “radical left lunatics” are “illegally and collusively” boycotting Tesla, which the president described as one of the best automakers in the world. This action, Trump said, was meant as an attack on Musk and what he stands for.

    It is not illegal for consumers to boycott companies. The Supreme Court in 1982 ruled the First Amendment protects Americans’ rights to protest private businesses.

    This is pretty much the reason high ranking government officials are supposed to be divested…

    Also:

    Tesla shares popped more than 4% in Tuesday morning trading. In addition to Trump’s promotion of Tesla, the stock may also be helped by a note to clients from Morgan Stanley advising them to pick up shares after the steep decline.

    Sounds like Morgan Stanley doesn’t want to be left holding the bag…

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/13/morgan-stanley-ups-tesla-target-gives-bull-case-of-800.html

    Less than two months ago they predicted it would go up to 800 so they told people to buy it…

    Instead it dropped to 200, and they’re still telling people to buy it.

    When an investment company just always tells people to buy a stock regardless of what happens, it usually means they’re heavily invested, so the higher the price the more they make.

    So there likely is illegal manipulation happening, it’s just trying to do the opposite of what’s happening

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      Honestly, even if the SC made no commentary with regards to the right to protest businesses… what the fuck would the play even be here? A fine or a tax penalty or something like that if you don’t buy a Tesla…? Seriously, I’m genuinely curious what the theoretical remedial action would be.

  • enkers
    link
    fedilink
    1084 months ago

    Someone’s being a pissbaby because nobody wants to buy stuff from fascists. Lul.

    This makes me think he just has no idea what a boycott is, because for it to be illegal, purchasing a Tesla would some how have to be legally mandate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      This is probably just a ploy to boost Tesla sales among his followers. And honestly, I’ll play the part of “owned lib” if it transitions MAGAs to EVs. Better than rolling coal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      How’s he going to feed his kids human shields if we don’t buy his cars?

      Slight correction.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    304 months ago

    “It’s illegal to boycott” translates to “You’re legally required to buy this product”. Anyone who can’t see that that is completely moronic bullshit already has there head up Trump and/or Elon’s ass for the delicate aroma.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Bad news for every snowflake Republican that boycotted Budweiser, Oreos, Target, and every other brand that has the audacity to support, serve, or even recognize the existence of LGBT people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          44 months ago

          telling others not to buy something from Trump’s buddies is verboten. Remember: it’s the President’s burden to interpret the law.

  • Rose
    link
    fedilink
    64 months ago

    Okay, guess I’m technically not boycotting Tesla. I just straight up can’t afford a car, not in this economy. Nor do I care, because there’s a bus stop just down the street. Not that I’m intimidated by Trump because I’m not American and he can’t prosecute this shit even domestically.

  • HeadfullofSoup
    link
    fedilink
    64 months ago

    Maybe the one he bought will explode near him with tesla you never know between a fire or a explosion