• sircac
    link
    fedilink
    English
    43 months ago

    That’s why the orange toupee said that they were wining millions a day… buy the dip, sell the rip

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    Backs down for a few days Also I’m mad that Tesla is up at 272 now from 221 earlier this morning

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      As if anyone is going to start buying Elon’s crap cars again just because Trump suspends some tariffs.

  • Rhaedas
    link
    fedilink
    2063 months ago

    “Soar”

    Looks back a month to compare

    Falling without style?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      923 months ago

      First thing I thought. Even after today, the S&P 500 is down 5% on the month and 10% since Trump took office

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      143 months ago

      This is a dead cat bounce. Nothing fundamentally has changed until Trump is out of office. There is no one talking him down from his bad decision making.

      He will move onto the next grift or scandal so he can dominate the next news cycle and make the old one go away. Eventually he will come back to fuck with the economy again.

      Rinse & Repeat/Round and round we go until he hits something big he can’t make go away like Covid did in his first term. Then he will loose it.

      If you want my bet on what that is, it will be a major war.

      • Rhaedas
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        War, cold war, or trade war? Maybe a mix, like trade war (since that seems to be sticking around) and a proxy war that the US is using to keep the war supply industry rolling (since he had broken all other industries).

        Don’t forget plenty of other pandemic potentials, especially since the US officially doesn’t recognize any problems anymore like climate or pollution or science.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Cold War wouldn’t dominate the news cycle enough.

          Some say we may be in the opening stages of WW3 so I’m imagining full on war or domestic instability/insurrection.

          Of course an unchecked pandemic should always be on anyone’s bingo card moving forward as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        He will move onto the next grift or scandal so he can dominate the next news cycle and make the old one go away

        This is his life’s work. Way before the presidency.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I guess y’all think 90 days is enough time for China to back down and for all of your manufacturing and supply chain to spin up?

    He could change his mind on a fart tomorrow.

    Farce.

    Can’t wait to see the demands for DEI removal from sovereign nations to avoid tariffs. Or more energy blackmail.

    🖕

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if the US moron brigade demands from African nations that they shouldn’t hire black people anymore.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Africa can do itself a favor by expelling all the American Christians that were there writing some of the laws for some of the countries.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    283 months ago

    For 90 days, if he can resist changing it again that long.

    I’m also pretty confused about how Canada and Mexico fit into this, because they said we’re included in the rollback to 10%, but we weren’t in the original “liberation day” tariffs in the first place.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    553 months ago

    The market reaction is dumb. 90 days bus very little for companies to adapt when years are needed.

    I think this but it’s just the people seeing his tweet immediately before he lifted the restrictions.

    Looks like we are still heading for recession and Treasury bills interest is still jumping up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      I think this but it’s just the people seeing his tweet immediately before he lifted the restrictions.

      Market doesn’t know if the tariffs are even coming back, and are taking the chance to buy back low.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        He suspended it for 90 days and also previously threatened that there will be more, so we don’t even know if next week there won’t be new tariffs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          It’s still possible that’s the point. Not the tariffs as a goal but as a weapon to hold over everyone’s head, to shake them down until they all bow before mango mussolini

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      223 months ago

      One part is a reverse game of chicken, buy the dippest dip to realize most profit from less dippy dip buyers.

      The other part is the assumption that this means the tariffs will never actually come or at least in a much relaxed form.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The vibe I get is that most elites really don’t want to believe the president could be dumb, because that means they could be too. Elites own and/or work with a lot of stocks, and that extends to their investing decisions.

        So they figure, sure, it must just be a 4D chess bluff.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Is anyone else disgusted by the term “elites”? It plays right into the mindset of the wealthy oligarchs, who sincerely believe they’re better than the rest of us.

          Such people aren’t “elite,” they’re useless parasites that wouldn’t be able to exist if they weren’t sucking the wealth out of us. It’s time we stop using a term that kisses their asses.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          it must just be a 4D chess bluff.

          Many of us hope against all evidence there is some strategic logic here, some actual plan, some intelligence behind the chaos. I’m still in denial that this could happen in the real world ……it’s just a hallucination about some real estate conman

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Yeah, that’s the basic attitude I’m thinking of. Normalcy bias feed into it as well as what I mentioned about meritocracy.

            I suspect it’s less common in the lower classes because if you’re poor, stability has never been guaranteed, or for that matter even reasonability. There’s no expectation that’s been set. Depending on a person’s roots there might also be cultural memory in there of previous times things went crazy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          And you really think “the elites” are the ones buying and selling here?

          Yes, they have a lot of wealth in stocks, but usually they simply own a large chunk of their (or their parents) company and the rest is managed by a fund manager. And if you have millions or billions, you don’t need to think quarter to quarter.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Wealth is a continuum; there’s no actual dividing line, like is commonly thought. But just personally, the posher people I know are less bearish, and it looks like the trend continues once you get even higher. Big fund managers tend to be in the picture. I don’t know off the top of my head how much movement is professionals and how much is retail investors.

            I feel the need to disclose that I’m personally short on the US, relative to other markets.

            Edit: And I should also mention the myth of meritocracy has a wide following, it’s just extra favoured by the people who would be implied to have merit by it. And there’s the fact that most people came up in a time where this sort of thing never happened, so there’s normalcy bias on top of it all.

          • partial_accumen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            and the rest is managed by a fund manager.

            This is one area I’m ignorant on that I wish I knew more. How are these daytraders or fund managers avoiding capital gains taxes? When they are liquidating a position as they are selling securities, they are trying to preserve prior gains. At best aren’t they getting hit with 15% capital gains taxes on the sale? If so, the fund manager has to believe they will lose more than 15% to justify the transaction right? Again this is best case assuming they’ve held the security for more than a year. Short term capital gains taxes can be as high as 37%!

            I understand folks making these vast swinging trades in their IRA or 401k where they are immune to capital gains, but how are fund managers (or regular retail after tax investors) making these wild swings without being eaten alive by taxes?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              53 months ago

              You are taxed on the gains, not on the total sale volume.

              So if I buy something today for $5, and sell it tomorrow for $6, I pay the 37% on the $1 of gain.

              So my takeaway is $5.63, not the $3.78 it would be I was taxed on the full sale.

              It’s also worth noting that capital losses can offset gains. So if I made $1000 on one trade, but lost $1000 on another, my effective tax is $0, because I didn’t make any money.

              This can get squishy though, as there are a lot of accounting loopholes you can do to count things as “losses” that are more losses on paper than actual losses.

              • partial_accumen
                link
                fedilink
                English
                33 months ago

                You are taxed on the gains, not on the total sale volume.

                You’re right, of course, I didn’t write that well. I’m in for the long term and don’t usually think about the smaller gains usually in short term. For me, even just the long term gains are substantial with the 45%-ish increases in value in the last couple of years prior to trump.

                It’s also worth noting that capital losses can offset gains. So if I made $1000 on one trade, but lost $1000 on another, my effective tax is $0, because I didn’t make any money.

                I knew this part too, but if a hedge fund/daytrader is doing this enough that their capital losses offset their gains, then they would be a pretty worthless hedge fund manager/daytrader, right?

                This can get squishy though, as there are a lot of accounting loopholes you can do to count things as “losses” that are more losses on paper than actual losses.

                This is the part I’m ignorant about, I think.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  13 months ago

                  If you’re concerned about that, you might look into index funds. Many are managed to minimize capital gains at a scale that you could never do in personal trading

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      I agree this is just market euphoria. We have a lot of systemic issues that have been exacerbated and/or entirely created by Trump.

      The core problem is Trump full stop. He is sitting in the White House with nothing but “Yes” men in his cabinet. It’s only a mater of time until he releases his next scheme on the market.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          No he won’t give tariffs up. This was his latest gift to make 10% tariffs on everything seem not so bad. I’m willing to bet 10% was always his goal and the crazy numbers he threw out were there to make 10% seem reasonable.

          The problem is after 4 months of attacking allies, siding with dictators, reneging on prior trade agreements he negotiated, and being called out for it globally. This latest economic grift wiped any trust the US had left.

          The US is uninvestable while he is in power. You can’t make major investments be it a billion dollar factory complex or some small business importing goods to build a product. You could be wiped out because of a mood swing or Orange Mussolini’s latest grift.

          Worse his tariffs put many US manufacturers at a disadvantage compared to foreign competitors. He’s just set the stage for a definite recession, long term slow economic growth or at worse a depression if the bond market fully breaks down.

          Even if he can get tax cuts passed they won’t do shit to put it all back together.

  • Justin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    35% Tarriffs on eu/Asia and 104% Tarriffs on China is still a recession. Other countries arent removing their Tarriffs

    The only positive thing this did was show that Trump is weak, so hopefully he’ll stay at these rates and maybe he’ll be out by the end of the year

  • Tempus Fugit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 months ago

    Oh boy all this uncertainty is surely good for their precious economy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    233 months ago

    Not specifically directed at OP, but I am sick of those truncated graphs.

    Also, fuck Trump. Not in a goof way.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 months ago

    Dead cat bounce is a real thing. At best its just increased volatility, which is not good.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113 months ago

    Here’s a headline. Donald trump orchastrates a stock market crash. Uses his social media company to signal the buy, and release the tariff news. Insiders and truth social followers get rich as markets pump 10% immediately after tweet is released.