The claim has a non linked URL where they compare the performance of a core i3 6th gen from a decade ago (presumably with 4gb ram) with a core ultra 5 just out (presumably with quadruple the RAM)

  • yeehaw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 months ago

    It probably is 3x faster. At siphoning your personal data.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    512 months ago

    “Just buy a new computer bro; hear me out, Windows 11 is what you need, j-ust j-ust justone more computer.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      “Stop it Morty! Microsoft just wants to sell licenses to hardware vendors, don’t you see it you, you, you stupid little btch. It’s a conglomerate, Morty!”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s incredibly stupid. Genuinely one of the worst comparisons by a large company in the last few years, and we just had the Nvidia fake frames scandal.

    Is this claim local, or do they do this across markets?

    Would be helpful to have a link.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Windows 11 PCs are up to 2.3x faster than Windows 10 PCs

        Based on testing performed by Microsoft in December 2024 using Geekbench 6 Multi-core score comparing a selection of Windows 10 PCs with Intel Core 6th, 8th, and 10th generation processors and Windows 11 PCs with Intel Core 12th and 13th generation processors. Performance will vary significantly by device and with settings, usage and other factors.

        I mean… okay? Pretty sure that has very little to do with the OS at that point. That’s kind of like saying the PS5 is faster than the PS4 – yeah, I’m upgrading hardware, of course it’s faster. Kinda surprised they only got 2.3x with that basis of comparison.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          “this is our best product yet”
          yeah i’d fucking hope so, otherwise why the fuck are you making a new version?

  • stinerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 months ago

    I’m typing this message on this computer (upgraded as far as it’ll go, running Debian Stable). No one needs any of this hardware for what most people use their computers for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      Right, so different boards, ssd chips, ram generations, even the displays make a difference since newer panels are more efficient on average. Absolutely inexcusable.

      Btw among the W10 devices they even put an Intel “Y”, a cpu with 3.5-7W TDP 😂. I have one of those and it’s the worse computer I ever used, recently revived with CachyOS because thankfully it has the x86v3 instructions (=it’s not too old)

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      The difference in performance from a Intel 11th gen and Intel 12th gen, with the same amount of memory and the CPU in the same class, is not measurable in daily life. The average for w10 devices is skewed to the bottom, and it’s also a comparison that doesn’t make sense. Of course a computer from ten years ago is slower. I would be surprised if it wouldn’t be like that.

      They wanted to do a comparison like Apple “M1 is 4x faster than our previous Intel laptop” but at least apple says which exact benchmark uses and it’s directly compared to the previous model on sale, not a random one from a decade ago (although Apple always chooses some useless benchmark like calculating integers or other stuff that has absolutely no impact in real life but has a higher result).

      Here Microsoft says “Web browsing is up to 3.2x faster” but we all know that RAM heavily influences web browsing. How much memory the chosen sample has? They don’t say it and I suspect they’re comparing 4/8gb devices vs 16/32gb devices

      Same for “Ms office is up to 2x times faster” but we all know that the difference is invisible in real use. Probably the w10 sample have sata HDDs (especially that i3-6100) while the w11 sample they all have nvme pcie gen 4 x4 drives so of course they load Microsoft word much faster.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 months ago

    Lol and the one with W11 it’s an Intel Ultra, aka the ones made with the modern lithographies at TSMC (like the AMD Ryzens, Apple Ms, etc)

  • Read Bio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Bro Windows 11 feels soo sluggish to use wdym Microsoft 💀🙏
    This is the specs I used to run it on(I3 12100f,GTX 1650,16GB ram)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    windows 11 is 3 times faster than windows 10

    Yes, it’s true. It took me 3 times as fast to know that it’s shit.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 months ago

    They’re technically not wrong. It’s 3x faster at stealing your data, so it’s 3x as faster at something.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Same hardware.

      It seems to be principally due to lower latency (less time looking for stuff in RAM or HD) and improved power management.

      • Consti
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        I actually had to test this with my hardware, Win11 is atrocious. I don’t have exact numbers, but Win11 uses so much more RAM for itself that it’s really noticeable how it just gets slower so much faster when I open stuff.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          On the one hand, using more RAM leaves less room for your stuff.

          On the other hand, unused RAM doesn’t do anything for you.

          So Windows 11 may actually be faster with sufficient RAM, but it’s gonna leave nothing for your applications.