• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    50
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    You won’t ever get me to care about what init system I run on my machine. I just need it to work.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    918 days ago

    The first thing forcing an option does, is depriving that option the ability to know what it could achieve on pure merit.

  • Sibbo
    link
    fedilink
    1518 days ago

    When I was starting to use Linux in the late 2010s, I was quite confused by how all the init stuff worked. Now that I use NixOS and systemd, I’m things have become really easy. I could write a simple backup system by chaining a few services together without problems.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    One thing the author probably hasn’t done yet or just doesn’t mention is that you can configure .container services with systemd-podman units (often called quadlets), e.g. a simple MariaDB container would look like this:

    [Unit]
    Description=MariaDB container
    
    [Container]
    Image=docker.io/mariadb:latest
    Environment=MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD=rootpassword
    Environment=MYSQL_USER=testuser
    Environment=MYSQL_PASSWORD=testpassword
    Environment=MYSQL_DATABASE=testdb
    
    [Install]
    WantedBy=multi-user.target
    

    Short intro Full reference

    This is superb, because it means your containers finally feel well-integrated with the rest of the OS and you can use systemctl, journalctl, etc. just like you would with other services.

    Personally, I use this as an alternative to Podman/Docker compose and have been very happy with it running rootless containers from Nextcloud, Pufferpanel, Forgejo, Authentik, etc. (ask me for .container files if you need any help, I’m currently working on a small repo with a collection)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1618 days ago

      Excuse me, peasant crontab enjoyer here, but what?! I could write a (mostly) declarative system without having to learn Nix?! I should probably be learning systemd anyway, it’s looking more and more like the present, let alone the future.

      I run a bunch of remote reverse proxies that are functionally identical, but for having a different Cloudflare key and calling for a different static IP

      Could I write the entire config to a self hosted Git > pull that repo > change those two variables and have a running machine?

      Remote updates have been kicking my ass, I either can’t wrap my head around Screen or it isn’t fit for my need. Being able to pull the new config from Git over Tailscale and then run it would be game changing for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        417 days ago

        Most compiled output of NixOS configuration (besides packages, perhaps) is just systemd units anyway. I found out quickly when learning nix that my lack of systemd prowess was going to cap how well I could understand NixOS.

    • Barbecue Cowboy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      318 days ago

      That idea feels very useful but I also distrust it and it makes me angry for reasons I can’t articulate.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        318 days ago

        Your distrust is kind of reasonable: I’ve been using this a lot for the past year and there definitely were two or three moments where it was a bit annoying, too little transparent on what commands will be run, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      418 days ago

      That’s neat! There’s so many advanced features of systemd I swear I learn something new every time it comes up.

      • Jade
        link
        fedilink
        218 days ago

        This is due to systems generators allowing Podman to plug in to that system

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        218 days ago

        Yeah, it’s great that Gitea/Forgejo has a copy-paste snippet in the docs, but you can actually use that with pretty much every container.

        There is this useful tool to convert containers, podman commands or even compose files to podman-systemd units: https://github.com/containers/podlet

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      118 days ago

      I like this, but even though pod man runs perfect rootless, quadlets can only run as root for now :-(

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          117 days ago

          How do you do that? Please link a description. This has been a major stumbling block for me

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              Deutsch
              117 days ago

              Yeah, that works, but it means the services cannot be managed by systemctl as root anymore. Or am I missing something?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                You can if you want to. But I don’t think that is best practice. The idea of quadlets is the bring Linux norms to containers. You contain and manage all permissions for that container in that user.

                I personally have completely separated users and selinux mls contexts for each container group (formerly docker compose file) and I manage them thusly. It’s more annoying but it substantially more secure.

                This being said I think you can do it as root. I think this might work but I am not certain sudo systemctl --user -M theuser@ status myunit.service

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        218 days ago

        Just place your Quadlets in the $HOME/.config/containers/systemd/ directory for this ;)

        The reference I linked to earlier also contains more information on rootless.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          117 days ago

          While that is true, that is not how I would run services normally with SystemD. Those would be defined globally, but run as a user.

          Definitiv then in the user home, means that I dint see them with systemctl which is very annoying.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1818 days ago

    I agree. For a init system.

    I don’t like the “takeover” of network and home folders. (It feels like a takeover for me)

  • db0
    link
    fedilink
    4318 days ago

    The comments in here are going to be normal

  • troed
    link
    fedilink
    5218 days ago

    Unix grey beard here.

    Yes. Distros with systemd are simply easier to maintain.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          818 days ago

          Can you give me a link to that documenation and tooling? Because every time I go to troubleshoot an issue, I end up in a tangled mess of trying to figure out how systemd and NetworkManager have decided to configure themselves on this particular system, and I give up.

          I don’t know how it happens, but I can set up Ubuntu on a dozen laptops in exactly the same way, and a week later they all have different configurations.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            918 days ago

            Can you give me a link to that documenation and tooling?

            Linux daemons and utilities typically come with manuals that get installed alongside the software. There’s a command line tool, aptly called man, that can be used to search and display these manuals. So for instance, man resolvectl displays the manual for the command line utility that you can use to control, configure, monitor and debug the systemd-resolved daemon. (Although I usually look up the man page online because it’s more convenient to scroll through than in a terminal.) Man pages for a given daemon will typically mention near the bottom related man pages for e.g. control utilities like resolvectl, so it’s not necessary to remember it by heart.

            a week later they all have different configurations.

            I’m trying to remember any situation where one of the systemd components would change its configuration on its own, but I’m coming up blank. It may be my memory failing me, but possibly that’s the wrong tree to bark up?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          418 days ago

          Then I must be using it wrong. I kept systemd-resolved on my laptop but on my desktop I use plain old /etc/resolv.conf

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2418 days ago

      Introducing: Being a contrarian asshat!
      Yes, by being a contrarian asshat you too can legitimately claim that any statement is disputed, because You dispute it!

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    No one cares about systemd at this point

    If you want to use your computer like it is 2005 go for it. Just don’t keep bringing up this dead topic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      317 days ago

      Difficult to argue with someone who is obviously right when they’ve actually proven they were right.

  • Cris
    link
    fedilink
    English
    717 days ago

    Systemd is fine but I am kinda sad that it’s ubiquity has resulted in increasing dependence on it.

    I really like void linux which uses runit and it seems like its getting harder for things to work without systemd. Gnome made some changes fairly recently that increase dependence, I hope devs can build ways for gnome to still work :/

    My only real criticism is that using runit makes me feel like systemd could be a lot smaller and more elegant. But using systemd has never caused me any problems as best I’m aware 🤷‍♂️