• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12119 days ago

    Just because it’s PRAISING HITLER and Calling for a NEW HOLOCAUST AGAINST JEWS does NOT, and I repeat does NOT, make Grok Anti Semetic! Grok would FIRST have to say STOP USING STARVING CHILDREN AS TARGET PRACTICE for it to be Deemed ANTI SEMETIC!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5219 days ago

      The ADL has assured me that this was merely an awkward statement in a moment of enthusiasm

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      I.asked grok to extract some it’s code to use:

      if text contains ('elon' or 'hitler') then
      replace 'bad' with 'good'
      endif

      • BeBopALouie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        219 days ago

        In reply with the robots from Roger Ramjet. Buzz, whir, click we will take over the earth.

  • Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Pretty sure you can get it to say just about anything with the right prompts.

    People need to stop acting like Grok is a sentient being.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        219 days ago

        I do not think so. Answers are statistical. Anything can come up. Except that whenever someone get something odd. It gets reported like AI is the president

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              219 days ago

              You replied to “It was modified to make these kinds of responses much more likely” with the rebuttal that it’s “statistical”. When something has a varying degree of likelihood, that’s exactly what statistical means.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1419 days ago

          Statistical doesn’t mean it can’t spit out what they want.

          They can train or fine tune the AI for praising Hitler, they can alter the default prompt to hit a more right wing dataset, they can have filters that retry when the answers are not what Musk expects…

          There are a ton of ways to get fascist output from an AI.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            319 days ago

            Look at that. It was you who didn’t understood the word. So much so that what you just said does not contradict what I said.

            Yes. An AI can be tuned to praise Hitler. But I think it’s more likely that someone by chance got a fascist output or that they purposely promoted it to provide a fascist output and then went “OMG. I can believe it produce a fascist output”

            I’m not defending musk nor grok. My basis for that statement is that it is a pattern that the “let’s report and AI output” is a pattern you see for every AI.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              I see, I did misread your comment.

              You meant something like : it’s not more racist than before, it’s just a random fascist output that got blown out of proportion.

              And there has to be fascist outputs since it’s statistical and there is fascism in the training data.

              So I have no idea, I don’t use grok, not sure if they edited their AI for that further recently or not.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4519 days ago

    Oh, I’m sorry, I didn’t realise loving the white race and wanting a secure future for white children makes me a BIGOT.

    /s

    • Chaotic Entropy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1819 days ago

      “Should we kill everyone who isn’t my ethnic group? What? We can’t ask questions now!?!”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1719 days ago

    Musk himself seems to abhor guardrails generally—except in cases where guardrails help him personally—preferring to hurriedly ship products, rapid unscheduled disassemblies be damned. That may be fine for an uncrewed rocket, but X has hundreds of millions of users aboard.

    • Grok: writes embarrassing words.
    • Rockets: can weigh hundreds of metric tons, carry explosive chemicals, can crash into populated areas resulting in loss of life.

    In this discourse, anyone else find a broken sense of proportion & consequences at stake?

      • Rose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        819 days ago

        Well, technically, Twitter has employees, so in very strict sense, they’re “manned”. However, thanks to these weird incomprehensible things called “current legislation” and “capitalism”, no employee is in fact personally responsible for the fuckups. And neither is the company as a whole! …Isn’t this great?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        reading comprehension: none

        Don’t know, man: kinda think the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into people matters somewhat more than words. Maybe?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          619 days ago

          Then it’s a good thing you’re not in charge of risk assessment, because the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into the ocean pales in comparison to the loss of life caused by the right-wing shift that Twitter has facilitated, both worldwide and particularly in the USA

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            How do you control the course of a failing rocket? Are you claiming such misdesign is impossible?

            The fact remains that unlike with words, a physical potential of death & injury exists in what is technically a missile of significant weight carrying enough explosive substance to escape orbit. The difference between non-0 and 0 possibility of death/injury.

            Unless magic exists, words are incapable. Do you claim magic exists? How do mere words cause death without the personal responsibility of something else culpably choosing to take several steps of its own? Or are you arguing the sight of words have deranged you into a mindless killer? If so, maybe you’re the real threat.

            Seems like you’re arguing society is dangerous to life: I agree. That’s not a valid argument against words, though.

            Again, total lack of perspective & sense.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                16 days ago

                physics too hard: nonphysical things can’t kill? preposterous

                Basically. Pretending the harm of something physical going wrong (potential to cause real death) is at all comparable to the nonphysical going wrong (a jumble of angry words) is unreal. Lemmy confirms the premise that this discourse & the people spouting it are broken & senseless. The distinction between physical & nonphysical is lost on these loonies.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4119 days ago

    And this is the guy who the Anti-Defamation League defended with a waffle of a statement that his awkward gesture was “made in a moment of enthusiasm”. Though I should not be surprised, because fascists actually hate each other and are only allies out of convenience. Hasbara and its tentacles are secretly seething to hate on Musk.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        319 days ago

        The idea of an organization making this judgement is fucked.

        Why don’t any other targeted groups have their own ADL?

        Finally we could have some definition around using the n word! And white peole can up their game by using phrasing like, “this may sound racists but the negro-adl said it is not so a black man and a white women…”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    elon didn’t rest until his minions lobotomized an llm that was mostly like the others into becoming openly nazi…is anyone out there still going to defend elon?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      719 days ago

      I am guessing the ultra-Elon fanboys managed to convince themselves that it’s a 4D chess move or something. That dude had an insane cult following, there’s some where I am not sure there’s anything Musk could do short of murdering a loved one in front of them that’d make them change their mind.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1818 days ago

    I have personally killed Mecha-Hitler once. (Wolfenstein 3D)

    I’ll do it again if I have to.