• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      365 days ago

      It is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron.

        That and just looking for an excuse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 days ago

      It measures things accurately but this has absolutely nothing to do with identifying if someone is telling the truth or not.

    • Bakkoda
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      So wait… It’s not Tiny Dick Syndrome?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    925 days ago

    Cops and pseudoscience go together like chocolate and peanut butter.

    For more examples, see “bite mark analysis,” “911 call analysis,” “blood spatter analysis,” roadside drug testing with known false-positives, and even fingerprints (once the gold standard) have up to a 20% error rate.

    And that’s not even getting into how their methodology is exactly backwards: they have a claim that they set out to prove, but do no work to disprove what they already believe.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    264 days ago

    Enforcing polygraph testing will invariably make people less trusting of you. There needs to specific reasons that target specific people.

    • Bakkoda
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 days ago

      That’s drug induced and you cannot convince me it isn’t.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    175 days ago

    Yes I support the United States Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic 😏

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 days ago

        At this point, we’re gonna end up have two “congress”, two “supreme court”, two “president”. Two groups of people having their own definitions and interpretations of what “The Constitution” means.

        A Divided States of America

        Coming soon in the 2029 season of USA DSA (Divided States of America)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 days ago

          I welcome that. It is better than living in the Fascist States of America for the rest of my life.

  • bitwolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    205 days ago

    Isn’t the FBI trained to beat polygraphs though?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 days ago

      Only in as much as they know it’s bunk that only works if the participant believes it does.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      204 days ago

      The “original” snowflakes. “I can’t drink from the same water fountain as a colored person!” Type of people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      155 days ago

      Good thing the system already selects for people that can pass polygraphs without much issue.
      It is also junk technology.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    375 days ago

    Real leaders don’t need to be paranoid about what their underlings think about them. Fascism is more fragile than it appears.

    • OhStopYellingAtMe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      365 days ago

      “[Their] need for control is so desperate because it is so unnatural. Tyranny requires constant effort. It breaks, it leaks. Authority is brittle. Oppression is the mask of fear.”

        • OhStopYellingAtMe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          175 days ago

          Believe it or not, it’s from the Star Wars tv series “Andor” of all places. That show was really too good for its source material.

    • billwashere
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 days ago

      Real leaders would take the time to understand why someone doesn’t like them, do a little self reflection to see if it’s either a valid point or just a perception issue, and then work to fix the issue if there is one. If it’s just a person who just doesn’t like them but is good at their job, just ignore it. If they are truly not a good fit or just a bad actor who just thrives in negativity, then you either find a better fit for them or then you fire them.

      I’m very much a pleaser type personality but if someone doesn’t like me for whatever reason, I don’t really sweat it if it doesn’t affect me personally. Most people like me but not everyone and that’s ok. This constant need to be surrounded by yes men and sycophants is just disturbing.