• Balder
    link
    fedilink
    English
    136 days ago

    I’m just thinking now that the Mac is next.

    I thought that as much as these companies preach about LLMs doing their coding, the cost of development would go down, no? So why does it need to reduce everything to a single code base to make it easier for developers?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I dont mind the web app as i dont have to install anything and i can sandbox it to my browser.

    Edit: using ublock in whatsapp ;)

  • OmegaSunkey
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46 days ago

    What’s so funny is that they were going to allow encrypted (they say) calls on the web app but then suddenly released a native windows client and told everyone if you wanted calls you need to use it, then removed all buttons for calls or video calls.

    I guess they’re coming back on that.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    136 days ago

    The whole point of webapps was not to have os specific ones. somehow smartphones caused everything to move backwards.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    436 days ago

    I’m really happy that this is not relevant to me.

    … because I don’t use Windows. I wish it was also because I managed to get rid of WhatsApp from my life.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 days ago

      I wish it was also because I managed to get rid of WhatsApp from my life.

      Jup, impossible for me if I want to keep in contact with 90% of my friends.

        • Semperverus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          122 hours ago

          Yep! Time to go back to the old ways… Brb while i just load up my server with 10tb of DVD rips from my garage and hook them up to my raspberry pi with jellyfin

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Why would anyone care about it being uglier?

    It’s WhatsApp. Ugly is their visual identity.

    If they changed their app to resemble a neon citylight barely anyone would even notice, let alone complain.

  • LiveLM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    136 days ago

    On one hand, requiring calls to be done on the native app but not on the web one because “muh encryption” was always stupid.

    On the other hand, the Native app was really well done.
    A well made app using the native OS ui toolkit is so rare. Now it’s turning into yet another stupid web wrapper.
    I’m so sick of everything being a web page.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 days ago

      I have a lot of problems with the native version. So much so that I use web app even though I have native app installed.

  • LumpyPancakes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56 days ago

    I never installed their app on Windows. I figured it could just randomly watch what I was doing, log keystrokes, view websites and history etc. I don’t know if I’m misunderstanding how much Windows apps can spy on each other - they don’t seem to ask for permissions etc.

  • Muhammad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16 days ago

    Does anyone have any idea why, I thought it was also quite liked by the community, no need to open up the extreamly slow web browser just to post one image or pdf

    • imecth
      link
      fedilink
      66 days ago

      It’s in the article. Each different version you maintain is an additional strain and added cost. It’s why applications are increasingly moving towards web versions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36 days ago

    It’s a shame. The app worked well, and it was nice to have a native look rather than a generic web one.

  • Prove_your_argument
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 days ago

    I’ve literally only ever used the web version on windows. It works fine, so what’s the problem? what functionality is being lost?

    More ram usage? oh no! I couldn’t possibly have free Ram left!