• Mwa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    234 days ago

    i remember they used to steal comments from real people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1416 days ago

    I am so grateful for this post! You always post such interesting content. 🦐⛹️‍♂️📷

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I think I’m blessed if not I wouldn’t have met Swirvel Handgwendt. She is a spectacular financial expert and saved me thousands every month! 💲💵🤑🙏

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        185 days ago

        I literally just saw a thread of these comments on a video. It was like 100 comments deep as well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          125 days ago

          I make $48k biweekly and was only JUST able to buy a house.

          Yes, I will only settle for a massively overpriced mcmansion, why do you ask?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          105 days ago

          Ah this is a whole different set of bots.

          The ones in the OP seem to be advertising a different youtube channel that then links to a website that supposedly contains nudes. That’s pretty new

          The one in yours, the “multiple people discussing a way to get rich” chain is pretty old by now, has been going on for at least 2-3 years.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Your post is very fascinatingly infuriating and very creatively mildly. Thoughts and Prayers

    🚀💥🌇🧍‍♂️💀💀💀🔫🤖

    2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣9️⃣ 🪖🧍‍♂️⚔️🤖

    👥🏆 🤖➡️🪦

    🤖🔛⌛️➡️⏳️ 1️⃣9️⃣9️⃣5️⃣ 🔪👩‍👦

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    666 days ago

    You know they’re fake because real YouTube commentors only have two modes:

    “Who’s watching in 2025” and “No one: Not a single soul:”

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Am I the only one who has assumed any account using the format “Firstname LastName” since the early 2000’s is a bot, because real people generally make creative usernames?

    I know it doesn’t exactly work in the age of Twitter, where so many people were never taught basic online safety guidelines, which included NOT USING YOUR REAL GOD DAMN NAME, but old habits die hard.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      166 days ago

      I’ve had my Google account for over a decade. At some point, I noticed my YouTube handle was just my name, and I don’t remember setting it to that.

      On pretty much all websites, I have a default username I try to use, but I don’t remember getting that option when making a Google account

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 days ago

        I noticed it when the display name changed from my account to the made up name I used for the account.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        for whatever reason i ended up with my real name associated with my google account, but thankfully you can just lie and say your name is “Phuck Yuu” or whatever else is fun when split in twain

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 days ago

      There’s a counterpoint to that. In real hard truth, nobody is anonymous and creative handles can be traced back to a name easily.

      But having pseudonyms affects human psychology. And makes people post things they wouldn’t want to be traced to them. And do things.

      There was a time when it seemed that everything is insecure. That time didn’t end. Just with HTTPS everywhere and encrypted everything and with glossy appearances people have genuinely lost all understanding of the real world.

      They think, metaphorically, that if there’s no name written on their door, everyone who asks can’t learn who they are.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 days ago

      Or Noun-NounNumber

      Like Jesus, mix it up. Even my ex wasn’t so boring with her usernames

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 days ago

      Google defaults new accounts to use the name they use for their email account unless you make a “brand account” IIRC which is actually fucking stupid

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 days ago

      These are all almost names in the same way. It makes me wonder if they’re variants in a language I’ve never seen before or (imo more likely) someone prompted ai for women’s usernames and it got confused by the cutesy ways people used to augment their names for usernames.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    305 days ago

    How long until the Internet is so full of bots and AI spam that it becomes impossible to even find our fellow humans amid the noise?

  • Metostopholes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    326 days ago

    Thanks for making such a great post! Your content is always insightful and funny, keep it up! 👉👌🥵

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    195 days ago

    I noticed a pattern. So many comments have that same emoji spam pattern, even if they seem different. Something seemed off for a while now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s morbidly amusing that spammers all use the same service, the same way (the cheapest OpenAI API, I guess? Which is notorious for this style.)

    And a silver lining. I could finetune a dirt cheap open model as a SEO/Engagement bot with very different styles, but ‘spammer culture’ seems to mass around the most popular denomenators when they find one. With such uniformity, I could also train a mediocre detector, based on overused tokens and something similar to the ‘slop profiles’ of EQ-Bench: https://eqbench.com/creative_writing.html

    screenshot

    (This is based on a storywriting prompt, but social media ‘vocabulary’ could be profiled the same way).

    In other words, its fortunate the spambots are such overpriced junk when they could easily not be.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 days ago

      In other words, its fortunate the spambots are such overpriced junk when they could easily not be.

      The ones you notice are overpriced junk. I’m convinced that this is on purpose, to make us less suspicious of the more convincing bots

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Oh wow, I was like “interesting, haven’t seen these” seeing the three emojis and stuff on yours

    However

    To test the theory, I (a car nut) went to one of the biggest automotive YouTubers, Mat Armstrong, who’s currently rebuilding his dad’s dream car and released the last video 2 days ago.

    Two comments, different profile, same profile pic that, zoomed out enough, looks like a vagina. Go on the profile and they both look like this:

    Edit: spoiler tag wasn’t working for everyone. Long story short, they linked another channel with a bottomless lady for the thumbnail

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 days ago

      Damn the thirst trap is real. Also the fact the profile pic looks like a vagina thing is so crazy (and obviously intentional). It definitely did make me want to see what the actual profile pic was though so +1 engagement point for the bot?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 days ago

        Removed the image to avoid traumatizing anyone else whose app might not work properly with spoiler tags

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 days ago

        Me neither but I think it’s the app I’m using and not the commenter doing it wrong. I’m using sync on Android.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I think some Markdown interpreters don’t like having images in the spoiler tags.

          I’m not sure if the Markdown spec specifies about images.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    316 days ago

    The worst is when you see a low sub count channel owner respond with the sincerest gratitude, like it really made their day to get such a supportive comment. I never have the heart to tell them, but I do try to leave an actual supportive comment of my own to sort of balance it out