https://x.com/i/status/1948211079001051267

The GOP chair was caught off guard and scrambled—first delaying the vote, then trying to sabotage it by adding amendments to include Biden administration communications. Democrats called their bluff and agreed.

Then the GOP chair, Rep. Higgins, lied, claiming the motion FAILED until Rep. Robert Garcia forced a full roll call vote.

Ultimately, the vote passed 8-2 after 3 Republicans DEFIED their leadership and joined all 5 Democrats to pass the motion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1218 hours ago

      Republicans are hypocrites — and have to be forced onto the record defying Dotard Trump — even though he’s a rapist and a pedophile.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Just browsed r/conservative for a bit to see the response there. Pleasantly surprised to see multiple posts where the top comment was something along the lines of “release everything, don’t care who is affected on either side”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1621 hours ago

    When he was the only person to say no, and then claimed “the noes have it,” that was the funniest gd thing I’ve seen all day. Hahahahahaha!

  • acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    541 day ago

    Can someone explain to this non-american why the Democrats are treating this as a successful upset when they could have released the Epstein files during Biden?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2922 hours ago

      Because they COULDN’T release them under Biden. They were sealed by court order until January 2025.

      There is a lot of desperate “both sides” nonsense going on here but the fact remains, Democrats are voting to release them and Republicans are not. If Democrats wanted to cover them up, why would they be doing that?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      741 day ago

      I don’t see anyone saying this yet, but the Epstein files were sealed by a court order for Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial. They weren’t unsealed until January of 2025. Biden couldn’t have released them without violating the court order that sealed them - and possibly giving Ghislaine’s lawyers a slam dunk to get her off with a mistrial.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          251 day ago

          Merrick Garland is a hard core libertarian centrist and Biden appreciated him for being status quo which means not rocking the boat or doing any effort to to hold anyone rich accountable as his previous bosses were BP and Amazon.

          He also refused to prosecute Matt Gaetz.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          151 day ago

          Because Merrick Garland is incredibly lazy. He spent his entire tenure sitting around doing nothing.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                122 hours ago

                After Maxwell’s appeal failed in September 2024 no related court orders needed to be respected.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Is there any U.S. administration that should be let off the hook in the last 25 years of ratfuckery? I’ll just be happy if your Democrats are desperate enough to combat overt corruption that they’ll accept collateral damage among theirs and their masters.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 day ago

          Garland is a republikkkan and a member of the Federalist Society. He was Biden’s greatest failure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        122 hours ago

        Biden couldn’t have released them without violating the court order that sealed them

        Presidents can do whatever they want as long as it’s an official act.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1022 hours ago

      Because they couldn’t, or at least not without potentially ruining the case while it was before the courts at the time?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      181 day ago

      It’s all bread and circuses until the 1% have extracted the last iota of capital from the rest of us and the country finally collapses.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 day ago

      The Dems have molesters/rapists on the list themselves. The difference is that we are not cultists and will gladly watch those perverts go to jail. Apparently MAGA just barely started caring about justice as it pertains to the files.

      Why were the files not released under Biden? Hell … Bill Clinton is on the list (shocking).

    • CanacondaOP
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Politik-brained Canadian here:

      IIRC they didn’t raid Epstein till 2019. In 2020 Democrats had a narrow majority in the house which they would lose in 2022.

      Than January 6, 2021 happened, and I think everyone thought that would be the legal case that brought Trump down.

      It kind of seemed inevitable that the Epstein files would get leaked or released eventually. That is until Trump officially ran again in 2023; creating the possibility that the evidence would be destroyed permanently if he won.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        118 hours ago

        creating the possibility that the evidence would be destroyed permanently

        This is sort of where I keep going back to in my mind. Like, I’ve seen things about supposed redacting or whatnot. So, like, what is there to be released if supporters of the Current Admins had them for so long?

        Some like original copy of something somewhere that somebody secreted away?

        And, how does something like that get proven to be…legitimate? Especially to a point of actionable repercussions?

        I honestly just don’t understand how this all works. Hoping for the damn best though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 day ago

        just to tie on to this, theres a none zero chance some prominent democrat “old guard” are also on the list, and their positions are too valuable to be lost (to the status quo). january 6th, if it was enough, would have been a great way to protect the old guard and get rid of trump. but thats evidently not what happened.

        i dont care whos on the list, from what side, i want them all punished. anybody whos complicit in the current shit show, or is on that list, needs to be shot in the street like a rabid dog.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 day ago

          While I was still on Reddit, there was a list going around of politicians charged with child sex offences. Sure, there were a few Dems, curse them to hell, but by FAR the majority were Republikkklans. The list was up to page 57 last time I sighted it.

        • CanacondaOP
          link
          fedilink
          41 day ago

          none zero chance

          I wager the actual chances are in the double digits.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 day ago

          We just need the files. I’m sure there’s gonna be plenty of “I was just on it because he was blackmailing me” or whatever, from everyone involved, innocent or not. Unless there’s something that literally has itemized “X person, 2 kids, diddled both, camera footage timestamp x:xx:xx” I really doubt much legally will come from it.

          Court of public opinion however, that’s gonna cause some real shakedowns, if people actually listen.

      • Ricky Rigatoni
        link
        fedilink
        71 day ago

        Than January 6, 2021 happened, and I think everyone thought that would be the legal case that brought Trump down.

        And it might have been if they didn’t drag their feet so much.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Biden likely would have never released it because his donors are on the list, also the general public on the US, if you haven’t caught on yet are like 30% complete idiots. A good example of this is that many people in comments on Instagram or other social media have said ‘‘why would anyone even willingly fly on a plane called ‘the Lolita express’?’’ Because they can’t figure out that the press started calling Epstine’s plane that long after the accusations and convictions were over with. They’re even more confused that the pilot of the plant never saw ANY sexual behavior or implied sexual relationship of any minors on the plane or even adults on the plane. How couldn’t he tell?! Because Epstine was a blackmail con man, not a ‘‘hay everybody here’s all my dirty secrets! Look at this! It’s incriminating!’’ Man. Blackmail necessitates obfuscation, and likewise gaining access to wealthy targets ment he ALSO needs to appear harmless and well connected to other wealthy people, who only saw normal behavior. So this list, the flight logs, even the island visitors, will all be at the very least 50% innocent people, if not way higher numbers. You only need a few successful targets to get by with blackmail and if the targets all have lots of money and know eachother the last thing you want is for them to be aware your blackmailing them all at once. And if he never did blackmail and just ran a pedophile ring, the level of secrecy would still be crazy high and he’d still want to look innocent to the majority of people he knew that’s how all child abusers and rapists in general tend to behave.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        322 hours ago

        Biden likely would have never released it because his donors are on the list

        Biden wasn’t able to release it because a judge sealed it as part on an ongoing investigation. Don’t let that stop your ridiculous conspiracy theories.

        The same “donors” would likely also support the Democrats now voting to release them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      Shhh! Don’t ruin it for the rest of us! On tomorrow’s episode of “As The Empire Crumbles”, will the files lead to anything actionable?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      The Attorney general under Biden, Merrick Garland, is a by the book liberal conservative. He assumed the treasonous actions of January 6 2021 would sink trump’s political career. He also believed - correctly- that the attorney general is appointed by a president to lead the judicial branch independent of the executive branch. Merrick focused the AG office on the January 6th investigation and didn’t publish the Epstein documents as they weren’t part of any specific case.

      There is also the theory that high ranking establishment Democrats are on the Epstein list. We also know that there are many pictures of epstein’s clients with underage girls that haven’t been published. Likely because American legal culture always seeks to punish the women involved in sex work and views the “johns” as victims who need to be protected

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 day ago

      Its a PR stunt. The democratic establishment doesn’t want them released. The democrats that do, are the minority faction of progressives, and they don’t have enough political power to actually get them released. Biden is not a progressive, he wants the uphold the status quo, including, protecting the Democrats on that list.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        322 hours ago

        Its a PR stunt. The democratic establishment doesn’t want them released.

        That makes no fucking sense whatsoever. Why would they overwhelmingly vote to realease them then?

        • @[email protected]M
          link
          fedilink
          222 hours ago

          It’s all performative. You vote for something you know has zero chance of passing so you can go “Look! Look! I’m good! I did the thing!” in the next election cycle even if what you really did is nothing.

          See the 50+ votes to repeal Obamacare.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          121 hours ago

          I’ll ask you this: Why didn’t the Biden Administration release it? Why did most congressional Democrats not demand the Biden Administration to release it? They had 4 years. Why demand its release now, now that they are out of power and they know that the current admin will never release it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      521 hours ago

      Can you help me understand Motion #2 by Mace? I was lead to believe that “credible” wording didn’t stick, but it sounds like you’re saying it actually did? If so, then yeah it leaves a lot open to being left out of the subpoena on that one word alone.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        521 hours ago

        Hey, you’re right! That amendment got struck down! With all the back-and-forth in that video I must have lost track. Good check, thanks!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    3 Republicans: “I might be a racist, zionist(somehow), corrupt piece of shit that sits down when my fellow Americans are put into concentration camps, who is all for authoritarianism and white nationalism,… but I ain’t no pederass protector!”

    a what, Walter?

    • CanacondaOP
      link
      fedilink
      81 day ago

      Just bottom rung people looking down on the only people left categorically worse than them.

      That’s why “chomos” need to be protected in jail.

      That’s why wanna be Chris Hansen’s are usually as creepy as the creeps they catch.

      That’s why violence posted online gets a free pass when its framed as a pedo getting btfu.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 day ago

    sooooo GOP chair who blatantly tried to defraud the American people in a cushy government position by abusing his position, he’s tossed outta the swamp now, right?

    or rather, into the new swamp down in Florida

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    351 day ago

    Hey, where’s all those losers that kept saying the Dems didn’t actually want it released? Come on out of the woodwork, ya fucking losers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 day ago

      I mean, Pelosi IS out there going out of her way trying to downplay the whole thing. Having a couple members of either party agreeing to subpoena the files doesn’t mean either party, as a whole, is supporting it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 day ago

        Keep on trying. One of these days, those Democrats will turn around and say not to reveal this info, and then that’ll vindicate the child-loving Republicans.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 hours ago

          “One of these days” Got anything else from your crystal ball?

          Literally any excuse to blame Democrats.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      123 hours ago

      I was saying it, or at least thinking it. Colour me pleasantly surprised.

      If there’s anything the two parties should be able to “reach across the aisle” to get done, I would hope a bipartisan pedo purge would be it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 day ago

    I suspect a lot of the GOP also want rid of Trump now he’s won for the second time.

    They’ve put in their time. They’re political lifers. They know they don’t really need him any more, and frankly his health will take care of that sooner rather than later.

    If he follows the rules, he can’t run again anyway. If he doesn’t then they don’t need him to win elections for them, because there won’t be any more. They’re just stuffing their pockets while waiting for any opportunity to try and get in a bigger chair. Their only worry is that someday, lobbyists might not want to bribe them any more to do their jobs.

    I suspect the list is being withheld for reasons other than Donald, who we all know is on it anyway. Plenty of more important shadowy figures who still have something to lose.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 day ago

        They’ll still obey the whip (because people that don’t get deselected come election time), but they’ll all be planning their next move once Trump is done.

        The only loyalty among the rank and file is the fear of losing their jobs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      I think you’re right. They wanted the $3T tax cut, and that’s exactly what they got. Trump is now unnecessary risk for the oligarchs, I wouldn’t be surprised if they pin all of Epstein on him to dumpster his ass now. Then we’ll have 2.5 terms of President Vance to look forward to, as he works with Silicon Valley elites to replace the treasury with shitcoins.

    • Schadrach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 day ago

      They want him to make it to Jan 21, 2027, then he can keel over. That way Vance can still qualify for two full terms afterward.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 day ago

        Vance doesn’t even seem popular in his own family, let alone with the public at large.

        Musk isn’t allowed to run so they’re all out of demagogues at this point, and their entire political strategy hinges on that. At some point they know they’ve got to shift back to pretending to be normal again. Their next candidate is going to be someone like Romney. They’re going to lose all the crazies when they do, but chances are they’ll just go back to not voting while hoarding bump stocks.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 day ago

          I broadly agree, but not sure I see a short term way back to winning as “normal again”, the “crazies” induced the vast majority of the party to be sycophants to the crazy, and this hopefully alienated some moderates. Not sure who they might break out for 2028 if they do have an actual free election, but I could see them in a tough strategic spot trying to claim being moderate with the behavior of the party since 2016 and particularly since Trump’s loss in 2020.

          So they have a lack of a good fit for the Trump crazy but also the liability of having tried to be close with the crazy…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 day ago

          I think the GOP media machine will continue to push more extreme candidates who are more akin to ramaswamy or some other techno-crat.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 day ago

          I, among other people I know who voted for DT have absolutely zero interest in voting for JD. He’s a Petey T puppet with the charisma of wet bread.

        • Schadrach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          124 hours ago

          I mean yeah. That said, if the GOP seems to start shining that turd a bit later than this time next year, know that the plan is for Trump to learn the meaning of planned obsolescence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There isn’t a list of abusers. The only person the files have evidence of abuse is Epstein himself. Per multiple sources interviewed by the NY Times, the only lists in the files are victims and witnesses, and releasing the files would just victimize them again to doxxing. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/24/us/politics/epstein-files-trump-bondi-justice-department-fbi.html

      Dems are jumping on the bandwagon because it distracts the Republicans from their rampage of destroying the foundations of our country, but the files themselves are a nothingburger as far any actual evidence of crimes.

    • kadu
      link
      fedilink
      71 day ago

      I suspect a lot of the GOP also want rid of Trump

      I suspect they don’t actually care at all except the companies lobbying these particular representatives are being hurt by the tariffs.

  • Noxy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1982 days ago

    the single person who voted no: “In the opinion of the chair the nos have it”

    the multiple people who voted “yes” laugh at the absurdity and call him out on it

    how fucking brazen a liar

      • BigFig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        392 days ago

        Should be grounds to have his ass beat

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          202 days ago

          I feel like this would be a great addition to congress. Make C-SPAN interactive and viewers can vote on whether or not to have someone involved in a proceeding flogged with something like a 90% majority.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It would be like the scene in The Simpsons (a really old episode) where the family goes in for group therapy and the counselor hooks them up with shock collars and buttons they can zap each other with, and they just go crazy shocking the shit out of each other.

            Found it.

          • Øπ3ŕ
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 days ago

            Do you want to get Caligula? Because, that’s how we get Caligula. 🤌🏼

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 day ago

            Imagine the vote manipulation. Now you have to worry about getting a virus on your phone that will silenty vote to beat up a member of congress

            • Øπ3ŕ
              link
              fedilink
              English
              123 hours ago

              Running for office would very quickly become running from office.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 day ago

      This is unsurprising.

      But forcing a recorded count does get those Republican Nays on record so they can be punished later.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      231 day ago

      MAGAs can’t resist cheating at every opportunity. Here we are again with standard election fraud on a micro basis, but we’re supposed to believe that they won the 2024 Election “Fair & Square?”

    • CanacondaOP
      link
      fedilink
      146
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m not holding my breath but I’m really hoping that will help maga chuds clue in that the GOP are wholly dishonest.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 day ago

        I get what you’re saying, but there are now two very distinct news spheres, and the one that they’re watching will simply not cover this story.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        912 days ago

        10% of them saying it was wrong is the best we’ll get. Him being charged with treason is what it should be

        • CanacondaOP
          link
          fedilink
          582 days ago

          Here’s hoping that 10% are our fucking dipshit relatives eh?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            352 days ago

            It has to at least fall under this:

            "§1001. Statements or entries generally Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

            (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749 ; Sept. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), 108 Stat. 2147 .)"

            https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=49&f=treesort&num=1262

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          142 days ago

          Actually they just want to “own the libs”. They’ll all scream to have the Epstein files released if you hint that AOC might be in there.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 day ago

            Of course they want to “own the libs”. They believe people get more conservative as they age, so kids have to be libs. And they definitely want to be able to own & trade children!

    • Frezik
      link
      fedilink
      682 days ago

      I’m guessing Roberts Rules stuff.

      As a quick and dirty thing, you can call a voice vote of ayes and nays. If it’s not particularly close, it’ll be obvious what the outcome is, the Chair will call the result, and everyone moves on. However, any member can call bullshit on the Chair, and then it goes to a more formal process.

      So without watching the whole damn video, it’s probably that the voice vote went one way, the Chair said it was the other, got called on it, and the roll call vote went against him.

      • kbobabob
        link
        fedilink
        101 day ago

        Why does this have so many upvotes? I mean the information is mostly accurate, but for this particular 8-2 vote it sounds like it’s just trying to make an excuse for the treasonous Higgins saying the vote failed.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 day ago

          It’s not making an excuse. It’s explaining to people how he was able to lie. If it was an roll call vote it’s next to impossible to lie about it, so it’d be confusing to some people who don’t know how the process works. It’s still blatant lying. It’s just helping to educate people.

        • Frezik
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 day ago

          any member can call bullshit on the Chair

          Yes, definitely making excuses.

      • Bob Robertson IX
        link
        fedilink
        English
        532 days ago

        2 people said ‘nay’ and 8 people said ‘aye’… It was an honest mistake anyone could have made.

      • veroxii
        link
        fedilink
        292 days ago

        I did watch the video and it was blatant and ridiculous.