• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There are a lot of smells that you are expected to deal with, it seems like kind of a reach. I consider most parfums thoroughly unpleasant but I dont expect it to be made illegal.

    That being said, I’m okay with this because of the littering aspect.

      • desktop_user [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 month ago

        I wouldn’t be so sure that my formaldhyde perfume isn’t carcinogenic, and that hasn’t been banned anywhere.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 month ago

        Oh FFS, yeah, cancer for people living in the same house. Getting a whiff of cigarette smoke isn’t doing jack shit to you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 month ago

        You must have a hard time being anywhere close to a car if you think you are getting cancer because of a 2 second wiff from some guys cig on a beach. Seems like exaggeration, cancer isnt some lightning bolt that hits you the moment you get a hint of something bad near you.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 month ago

          cancer isnt some lightning bolt that hits you the moment you get a hint of something bad near you.

          You’re correct, it isn’t a lightning bolt. This goes against your statement, not with it. It’s an accumulation of increased risk, and eventually it just happens (or doesn’t). The more things that increase your risk the higher the odds. You don’t just get cancer because someone smoked near you. You have an increased risk of cancer based on how much you’ve been around your entire life, and everything else that contributes. Reducing risk means reducing as many contributors as possible.

          You must have a hard time being anywhere close to a car if you think you are getting cancer because of a 2 second wiff from some guys cig on a beach.

          One thing is bad, so we can’t do anything about another thing? “People are being killed by cars, but we can’t work to reduce that because people are dying from heart disease!” How silly.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            The impact from those few odd times someone is smoking near you in an open areas is not proportional to the risk you are attributing to it imo. I am bringing up cars to highlight that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 month ago

              Less exposure to smoking also makes some people less likely to take up smoking, as its presence isn’t so normalized. So that’s a lesser burden on medical infrastructure and fewer sources of secondhand smoke. Wins all around.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 month ago

          Air and particulate pollution from cars is actually a pretty significant factor in respiratory health.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Yes, we need to ban cars as well, pretty much all internal combustion. Unfortunately there are technical reasons that will take a while, but we’re making progress. Even worse my country has turned it political with regressives gleefully trying to turn back what progress we’ve made