• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Fake quotation of me, attributing others’ “mindset” to me, claiming I didn’t understand it, selectively ignoring statements I have made, twisting my words to fit your point, implying a human couldn’t have had an ai write or help with this work even though writing is one of the most commonly replaced professions by ai, accusing me of stating opinions as fact, insulting me to discredit what I said.

    And all of that in just a few sentences, impressive. I hope you aren’t this evil and just don’t realize how manipulative your rhetoric is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean reading the first sentence of the article would have cleared up any confusion, you’ve shown how foolish you are, but bloviate all you want dude. Who just reads an article title and thinks that’s the entire article lmfao.

      Act like a 5 year old, and get treated like one, what else would you expect lol.

      Also, never insulted you, I just said if you come across like a fool, you will be treated like one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 days ago

        I mean reading the first sentence of the article would have cleared up any confusion

        How so?

        Act like a 5 year old

        Where did I do that exactly?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 days ago

          How so?

          Let’s see…

          I think the AI couldn’t differentiate between name and job title.

          The first sentence made it clear it wasn’t a name, so if you read the article, you wouldn’t have made this claim.

          Where did I do that exactly?

          See above.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 days ago

            AI writes iteratively, so this doesn’t mean anything. Also notice the “I think” in the beginning, that’s an opinion, not claiming facts like you do.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              … so you are a fool for thinking that ai confused a name and title even after having the article explain it… why would you “think” it’s confusing it when you know they aren’t? That’s being a fool lmfao.

              Your opinion isn’t valid and makes you a fool since the “facts” show that it didn’t happen. Not everything is Ai just because you don’t understand it… again…

              Why are you arguing so badly that this is Ai and the only defense is either not reading the article or just ignoring the obvious…?