Seriousely how many of you do that? Sincearly a european

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    165 days ago

    I used to microwave water for all sorts of things before getting an induction stovetop.

    Seriously, it goes from tap water to boiling in 2 minutes. It’s a game changer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      65 days ago

      My electric kettle does about the same. Long enough to finish a piss before doing the water things.

      • palordrolap
        link
        fedilink
        15 days ago

        My kettle boils a mug’s worth of water in less than a minute, and it takes me longer than that for even a brief toilet visit and washing of hands. I have learned not to switch the kettle on until I get back from the bathroom, otherwise I’ll be boiling the water twice.

        Important factors: 1) Britain has 230V mains power so electric kettles can boil water incredibly quickly, 2) The stereotype about Brits and tea is true in my case. I get through three to six mugs of the stuff per day. 3) Hot tea must be made with boiling water. Power isn’t cheap and re-boiling the water adds up over time.

        • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
          link
          fedilink
          24 days ago

          Mine takes longer, but I never brew a single mug. I brew a full pot and I only reason I limit myself to that is because of the size of my kettle.

    • Victor
      link
      fedilink
      45 days ago

      Induction hobs I think are still less efficient than an electric kettle, right? Correct me if I’m wrong. (I have both but I don’t have the know-how to measure the effect of either. Just what I’ve heard.)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 days ago

        If you have both, and a timer on your phone, should be easy enough to check. Put the same measured amount of water in both and see how long it takes to boil.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          145 days ago

          this only works if both have the same energy consumption.

          this is probably not the case, so you also have to measure the energy consumption and then adapt the measured time accordingly.

        • Victor
          link
          fedilink
          24 days ago

          Yeah I meant efficiency, not effectiveness. Like power consumption vs time.

      • slazer2au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 days ago

        It would be interesting to test. quick, someone poke Technology Connections.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        14 days ago

        Right. The hob need to heat up entire surface of your cookware, and kettle transfers heat directly from the element below to water - only then some of that heat is dissipated.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 days ago

        Right. The hob needs to heat up entire surface of your cookware, and kettle transfers heat directly from the element below to water - only then some of that heat is dissipated.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            24 days ago

            Induction directly heats the bottom of the cookware (as opposed to regular hop heating the surface which then heats the bottom of the cookware), and from that bottom the heat is transferred through the entire volume of your utensils. And then food is heated off that.

      • Sidyctism II.
        link
        fedilink
        25 days ago

        afaik electric kettles are the most efficient machines around. something like 95% efficiency

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Every thermal machine is technically ~100% efficient at producing heat, but then how much heat is spent usefully is another metric, depending on materials used (and subsequent thermal dissipation), loss in cables, etc.