• PhobosAnomaly
      link
      fedilink
      29
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I get it, it’s still jarring though. I get that an LGBTQI+ mag would want to promote his sexuality to prove visibility of senior civil servants or G-men or whatever the US calls them, but it just feels like a qualifier that shouldn’t be necessary.

      Happy to learn otherwise though, I’m open to opinions.