• PhobosAnomaly
    link
    fedilink
    29
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I get it, it’s still jarring though. I get that an LGBTQI+ mag would want to promote his sexuality to prove visibility of senior civil servants or G-men or whatever the US calls them, but it just feels like a qualifier that shouldn’t be necessary.

    Happy to learn otherwise though, I’m open to opinions.