@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 2 years agoStarfield is now mostly negative in recent reviewsstore.steampowered.comexternal-linkmessage-square271fedilinkarrow-up1599cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1599external-linkStarfield is now mostly negative in recent reviewsstore.steampowered.com@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square271fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish109•2 years agoSomehow it got nominated for the “most innovative gameplay” in the Steam awards. Absolute joke
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish69•2 years agoIDK, it’s been awhile since someone had the audacity to make something so repetitive and pass it off as AAA gameplay.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoyou need to be able to open the game to see the bland gameplay
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish40•2 years agoIt required true innovation to make a game this aggressively mediocre and bland. True
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish31•2 years agoIt’s completely beyond me. Bethesda fanboys had to be on some hard as shit copium to nominate it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•2 years agoYou can hate on it all you want, even say the game was boring and bland. But the way they did New Game + was very innovative.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoYou have to complete the game to even play the New Game +, dont think that’s what got them the nomination
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoThat’s like a film winning an award based on the director’s cut
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoA directors cut you cant even watch until you watch the regular cut that no one cares for
minus-squareWilliamlinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoI thought that was a good idea, and I’m a huge fan of timeloops… But so much of the rest was poorly done that after a couple loops, you stop wanting to loop.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoI can’t really think of any part of it that is innovative. Just basic game systems that have all been done before slapped together.
Somehow it got nominated for the “most innovative gameplay” in the Steam awards. Absolute joke
IDK, it’s been awhile since someone had the audacity to make something so repetitive and pass it off as AAA gameplay.
Yeah, the last time was FO4
FO76 is calling…
you need to be able to open the game to see the bland gameplay
WE DON’T TALK ABOUT FO76.
It required true innovation to make a game this aggressively mediocre and bland. True
It’s completely beyond me. Bethesda fanboys had to be on some hard as shit copium to nominate it.
You can hate on it all you want, even say the game was boring and bland.
But the way they did New Game + was very innovative.
You have to complete the game to even play the New Game +, dont think that’s what got them the nomination
That’s like a film winning an award based on the director’s cut
A directors cut you cant even watch until you watch the regular cut that no one cares for
True that idea was definitely cool
I thought that was a good idea, and I’m a huge fan of timeloops… But so much of the rest was poorly done that after a couple loops, you stop wanting to loop.
I can’t really think of any part of it that is innovative. Just basic game systems that have all been done before slapped together.