• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    sorry but that’s not a fair analysis of the data put forward by ACLED here. they are counting demonstrations not demonstrators. and they are most certainly not couning charges so no clue where you got that.

    here are some similar, though admittedly not directly parallel, statistics (published jan 2022):

    • 6.8% of pro-Trump demonstrations (112 of 1,646) between January 2020 and November 2021 were armed compared to 1.5% of all other demonstrations (501 of 33,298).
    • The percentage of armed pro-Trump demonstrations increased last year. In 2021, 8.8% of pro-Trump demonstrations were armed (32 of 364) compared to 6.2% in 2020 (80 of 1,282).
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Doesn’t matter. There was violence at Jan 6, ergo Jan 6 was 100% violent. Compare that to nearly 0% violence for the students. Why do you think 100% and 0% are close?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                71 year ago

                I’m coming at you for acting like you’re making a valid point, and lying when people confront you about it. Now, could you please explain?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    7
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You said:

                    I’d say BLM was near 0% violence but you’re say it was 100%.

                    Again, how do “I’m say” that BLM was near 100% violence? Most BLM protests were completely peaceful, meaning BLM was near 0% violent. Why do you lie and say I’m saying the opposite?