Several prominent Muslim scholars have issued a rare religious decree or “fatwa”, calling on all Muslims and Muslim-majority countries to wage “jihad” against Israel after 17 months of devastating war against Palestinians residing in the besieged enclave.

Ali al-Qaradaghi, the secretary general of the International Union Of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), an organisation previously led by Yusuf al-Qaradawi, called on all Muslim countries on Friday “to intervene immediately militarily, economically and politically to stop this genocide and comprehensive destruction, in accordance with their mandate”.

“The failure of the Arab and Islamic governments to support Gaza while it is being destroyed is considered by Islamic law to be a major crime against our oppressed brothers in Gaza,” he said in the decree comprising some 15 points.

Qaradaghi is one of the region’s most respected religious authorities and his decrees carry significant weight among the world’s 1.7bn Sunni Muslims.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1634 months ago

    I’m sure Western News will report on this in a completely fair, unbiased, and reasonable way, of course.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      134 months ago

      Yes because as we know western media is known for having a fair and unbaised view whenever a native people fight back against a foreign military occupation. Especially when said resistance is supported by a non Christian people who also dont fit the arbitrary definition of white.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        139
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Muslim scholars are calling on fellow Muslims to fight back against genocide.

        The problem is that they are scary words like “futwa” and “jihad” and, in the West, this language is seen as uncivilized and barbaric.

        Orientalism, in other words.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I used two different translation engines and neither mentioned the word genocide, which is also a “scary” word. So i suppose that is also a biased view. I’m not saying it’s not a genocide, all im saying is it is disputed outside of lemmy and therefore not unbiased. The original text mentions “agression”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            64 months ago

            Not sure what your translation says, fatwa or not doesn’t really matter or do shit for the Palestinians.
            But I do know MEE is a UK based garbage source.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            634 months ago

            Right, but whether or not it’s disputed outside of Lemmy doesn’t change the fact that it’s a genocide. The only people who don’t think it’s a genocide are those in favor of the genocide and the genuinely uninformed/propagandized.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              All i asked for was an unbiased take on it because that was what was requested, that the media reports on it without bias. So i wanted to know what it looked like. And it does not look like that.

              • Kuori [she/her]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                324 months ago

                neutrality in the face of oppression is just siding with the oppressor for cowards. you’re either against genocide or you’re for it. your position here is clear.

              • Well, I hope we can agree that genocides have occurred in history. Putting this article aside, how do you propose a genocide be reported on as it’s occurring without being biased?

              • davel [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                264 months ago

                “Unbiased” does not mean “statistical mean”.

                If 1 + 1 = 2, then it equals two irrespective of anyone’s opinion on the matter.

                But zeroth of all, there is no such thing as an unbiased take, because no one is without bias.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  34 months ago

                  It’s obviously disputed and the ongoing case against israel has not yet deemed it a genocide. Once the court has done so, it’s no longer just a biased opinion, but ruled by the UN to be a genocide.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            184 months ago

            I think for now most objective would be “actions consistent with genocide” and war crimes. That being said most prominent human rights organizations do classify it as genocide. Here i think bias was referring to nonfactual reporting, so translations or what some people dispute bears no value.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          654 months ago

          I mean at this point if you have seen what Israel has done, unfiltered by the media, then there is almost nothing that will shake people out of their views. If you support Israel after knowing that they purposefully shell hospitals and children, then you will most likely keep supporting Israel no matter what. Same goes for those who oppose Israel and it’s genocide.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    254 months ago

    Last time they issued a fatwa was in 2017 in response to Larry David’s hit play “Fatwa!”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Gee, I never would have guessed that would be a result of Israel’s actions in Gaza.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    454 months ago

    Meanwhile every Muslim country government bar Yemen: Nah, I don’t really feel like it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          134 months ago

          Lol I was thinking the whole western world accepting all Israeli transgressions against international law, and rewarding her with political shielding, vetos, and their own citizens tax money… And double standards.

          No where in the world is it acceptable to use a military against unarmed civilians with sustained force. But Israel gets her pass… Why?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      74 months ago

      In yemen the houthis (aka not the government) is willing to do anything, the actural government only makes statements and votes in the UN while taking no real action.

    • AreaSIX
      link
      fedilink
      174 months ago

      I’d say Iran and Hizbollah in Lebanon haven’t exactly ignored the situation either, and have paid a fairly heavy price themselves thus far.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yet only Yemen really does it and countries like Saudi Arabia or UAE are in bed with Israel. How many of muslim (sunni i guess since it was sunni fatwa) majority countries will follow this fatwa?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          Many have, but that’s the thing Israel is still committing genocide if Palestinians leave their home.

      • Oniononon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Everything is a core pillar of islam depending on if you are trying to promote the religion of peace, drink beer and eat bacon, take slaves or stone a child to death for being raped.

          • Oniononon
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Yeah like every religion has never been used to justify literally anything. Saying the fucking religim that treats women like shit and kills lbtq people has “protecting the weak” as a core pillar is same as saying musk did an awkward gesture and his points on twitter make sense. It’s lying with an agenda.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              34 months ago

              Sorry, bigot, your talking points from October 2001 don’t really fly in the rest of the world.

              • Oniononon
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 months ago

                Do women suddenly not wear burqas and they are allowed to go outside, drive cars, own property in all the muslim countries that are not westernized and are therefor closest to true islam? Hows the gay communities doing there?

                This has nothing to do with israel genociding a weak group they have not managed to assimilate or make diplomatic deals with for decades.

                This is anout you claiming islam protects the weak, which it does as much as russia or israel.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  Its a woman’s choice in most non westernized Muslim countries, those countries, incidentally, containing a minority of Muslims.

                  Incidentally westernized Muslims countries tend to have the harshest restrictions, like Saudi Arabia.

                  As far as gay communities it, like it always does, depends on local culture. Pakistan officially recognizes transgender women; Saudi, the West’s darling, stones gay people. Iran has multiple gay organizations that are recognized by the state, and Sudan was influenced by Christians so they really hate the gays. As it turns out different people and cultures believe different things regardless of religion.

                  Almost like people are people, you bigoted fuck.

                  Islam is a religion of peace, and does explicitly promote protecting the weak and doing charity. Its a large reason why Jews were safe in Palestine for centuries before zionist decided to hijack the region.

                  If bigots like you didn’t exist, maybe we could move on from demonizing 1/8th of humanity and start to deal with the actual problems you mentioned.

  • Omega
    link
    fedilink
    64 months ago

    Calm down scholar there isn’t even a religious leader for islam anymore

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      When Muslims go to Hajj pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia, they pay to kill kids in Gaza. Those bomb dropping airplanes are not EV.
      Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, Eygpt, and Morocco these six in particular paid actual money, intresected missiles toward Israel, delivered oil shipments, fought the Houthies blockade, and contributed with military intellegence and weapons , and made new air/sea/land routes for trade that kept Israel genocide for 17+ months.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        84 months ago

        The Saudis are separately at war in Yemen and against the Houthis and have been since I think 2015.

        The Houthis have just endured a decade of fighting a US backed coalition, which isbwhy they’ve become increasingly capable of expanding their operations to interfere with shipping lanes unrelated to their direct civil war.

        MIC knows it must sustain war and conflict and will always play all sides to keep the orpham crushing machine going.

        If it stops, or even threatens to slow, well… stonks go down faster than any tarriff effect.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    114 months ago

    Muftis (and scholars) occupy a prominent position in Islam but their departments often sit within the state. They owe their existence to the state governments they’re in. Even if this decree carries weight among muslim communities where fatwas are often studied to their minute detail, respective muslim governments ultimately have the final say on whether they’re willing to adopt their decree. With leaders like MBS and others, I doubt there’s real appetite for change even if the fatwa in question is in line with traditional islamic laws.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      124 months ago

      Muslims: we should defend Palestinians.

      You: look at these stupid brown people thinking they have the right to defend themselves against the civilized white man.

      How do you propose they get rid of the occupation. Flowers?