Archaeologists excavating a Roman-era fort in northern England have unearthed several enormous ancient leather soles that measure more than 11.8 inches (30 centimeters) long.

The finds add to the archaeologists’ growing collection of supersized ancient footwear found at the ancient fort, known as Magna. The researchers now have eight of these extra-extra-large shoes — a quarter of the total found at the site.

The shoes were discovered at Magna — also known as Carvoran — a fort along Hadrian’s Wall, which was built around A.D. 122 to demarcate the northern extent of the Roman Empire. Magna is situated about 7 miles (11 kilometers) west of Vindolanda, the large Roman auxiliary fort that’s well known for the remarkable preservation of writing tablets, military medals and leather shoes.

  • Jay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216 days ago

    I wonder if they were some form of “outerwear” that you would wear over your normal footwear in the cold.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 days ago

      The article says they are basketball player sized.

      Maybe they were sending really big soldiers to the front. This is near the peak of the Roman empire, which spanned multiple continents and had over 100 million people.

      • Zos_Kia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 days ago

        Romans were (justifiably) terrified of Picts and Caledonians who were tall, strong, and very barbaric in appearance. It makes sense that they’d send their beefcakes up there to sort of even out the odds.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 days ago

          ‘Barbaric’. A Roman word, possibly from the Romans saying about foreigners, along the lines of, “they were all like, “ba ba ba ba ba”, I couldn’t understand a thing they were saying”. “They’re ba ba barians! What do you expect”.

          So being a ‘Barbarian’ is not about vicious behaviour, rather simply being a foreigner to Romans casts a person as being called that. It’s essentially rascism.

          Source: Terry Jones’ Barbarians

          I even found link to the whole book! https://archive.org/details/terryjonesbarbar00jone

          And yes, they were terrified of them, in large part because Rome was well and truly sacked! (Can’t remember who by now). An act that ironically spurred the creation of the famous Roman empire.

    • Ogmios
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 days ago

      Or, if you wanted to be more inquisitive rather than sarcastic, you might consider the origins of the word.

  • Øπ3ŕ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25 days ago

    Oh, poor chivalrous giant, ηΩδΩρ. Always the gentleman, getting the door since way back.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25 days ago

    OK, 11.8 inches, that is 29.972cm or 45.41 Paris Stiches, i.e. European size 45. That’s big, yes, but is it really that extraordinary?

    Given that overall size and shoe size are roughly correlated, maybe they just had a kind of “elite group” of large warriers to intimidate the Picts? Or maybe one large guy, high enough in the ranks to be able to afford more than a single pair of Caligae?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        That, too. I mean, in the end they are caligae, sandals. Not exactly the stuff you’ll usually wear up at Hadrians Wall, especially during the winter. So wrapping a lambs fur around the feet will take the shoe European size 45 down to feet European size 40 to 42.

    • Øπ3ŕ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 days ago

      And here I thought one Caligula was too many.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25 days ago

    It’s not that big? My shoes are one EU size larger, and just small enough that I don’t have to order specialty shoes. That starts at 47 and above. 46 are usually made for most models

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 days ago

      Possibly very big at the time. Over the course of the last century we have grown a lot and the average height is much higher because we’re eating much more. I suppose feet size have also increased.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75 days ago

    How is this a big (heh) deal? I wear an 8.5 shoe and my feet are 10". If I measured my boots, they would be close enough to having 12" soles.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 days ago

      Nutrition was harder to come by and people were generally shorter, these are notable for being very large shoes for the time period.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 days ago

        That’s a great point. Was there an elite royal guard situation around that time they bred and fed well?