Ya, being with a trans man would be a lot less gay than a trans woman. Confusing, and probably worthy of the label queer but certainly not nearly as gay as actually sucking dick.
I agree being in a relationship with either of them would be confusing but the simple fact is I don’t like dick… I also don’t like pussy with a beard and chest hair, but I’m not in a place where I have to pick.
Hmmm I wanted to say you’re adding qualifications to the definition of straight, but I had to check myself and the definitions I found did indeed say “sex”, not “gender”.
I hadn’t ever looked at it before and I thought it meant gender. Maybe I’m more queer than I thought. 🤔
Well, I appreciate you for holding a civil discussion from a position of good faith nonetheless. This is quite rare on the internet and unique among the commenters replying to my original post.
I haven’t seen the other threads (when I first replied, there was at most 1 other reply), but I was ready to drive that meaning at you, but when I went to get the evidence to back it up, the evidence surprisingly didn’t favor it.
So I had to go back to the drawing board. Even as far away as the drawing board was. By which I mean my assumed sexuality’s definition.
Ya, being with a trans man would be a lot less gay than a trans woman. Confusing, and probably worthy of the label queer but certainly not nearly as gay as actually sucking dick.
I agree being in a relationship with either of them would be confusing but the simple fact is I don’t like dick… I also don’t like pussy with a beard and chest hair, but I’m not in a place where I have to pick.
Hmmm I wanted to say you’re adding qualifications to the definition of straight, but I had to check myself and the definitions I found did indeed say “sex”, not “gender”.
I hadn’t ever looked at it before and I thought it meant gender. Maybe I’m more queer than I thought. 🤔
Well, I appreciate you for holding a civil discussion from a position of good faith nonetheless. This is quite rare on the internet and unique among the commenters replying to my original post.
Yeah, I’m trying to work on it specifically.
I haven’t seen the other threads (when I first replied, there was at most 1 other reply), but I was ready to drive that meaning at you, but when I went to get the evidence to back it up, the evidence surprisingly didn’t favor it.
So I had to go back to the drawing board. Even as far away as the drawing board was. By which I mean my assumed sexuality’s definition.